In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v.

    In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v.

    In the leading case of Lazarenko and Others v. Ukraine (nos.

In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, 10   February 2011) and Ignatov v.

    In the leading case of Mikhaylova v. Ukraine (no. 10644/08, 6 March 2018), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine (no. 40107/02, 10   February 2011) and Ignatov v.

    In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v.

    In the leading case of Nemet v. Serbia, no. 22543/05, 8 December 2009, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154‑58, 22 May 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 8.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Nechay v. Ukraine (no. 15360/10, 1 July 2021) the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary (no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015) the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Veiss v. Latvia, no. 15152/12, 28 January 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

In the Court’s view, leaving the secret surveillance operation to the sole discretion of law enforcement authorities, the domestic law failed to provide adequate safeguards against various possible abuses

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; for more recent case-law see Beketov v.

    In the leading case of Pavlík v. Slovakia (no. 74827/01, 30   April   2007), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 14.