That being so, the Constitutional Court also held that Article 15 § 9 of the Statute did not indicate the criteria according to which it could be decided to extend the employment contract after the age

It was true that the Constitutional Court was not competent to quash individual decisions, as its role was to rule on the constitutionality of normative acts.

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT PROCEEDINGS Application for constitutional review 12 .

engaging in constitutionally prohibited arbitrariness. [26]     In this context, the Constitutional Court did not disregard the fact that, in another case, the [second applicant company’s] constitutional

their constitutional complaints.

On 10 June 2009 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s constitutional complaint. (ii)     Civil proceedings no.

       On 24 September 1990 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicants' complaints under Article 139 of the Constitution (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz) challenging the constitutionality

    On 16 November 1993 the Administrative Court requested the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of section 15 § 1 of the Tirol Land Planning Act ( Flurverfassungslandesgesetz

CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINTS The Constitutional Court Act 16 .

Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)

one of “special constitutional importance”.

   On 14 March 1989 the Constitutional Court refused to consider the applicant's complaint pursuant to Article 144 para. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Law (Bundesverfassungsgesetz).

A constitutional complaint may be lodged to challenge the constitutionality of a statute or other normative act which constituted the legal grounds for the final individual decision whereby a court or

    The applicant lodged his constitutional claim challenging the constitutionality of the 1993 Law.

  In its judgment of 16 January 1998 the Constitutional Court dissolved the RP on the ground that it had become a “centre of activities against the principle of secularism”.

The applicant foundation lodged a constitutional complaint on 24   September 2018, challenging the constitutionality of Article 353/A of the Criminal Code, which was dismissed by the Constitutional

Enoncé de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité 6. A l'occasion du pourvoi qu'il a formé contre ce jugement, M.

Saisi d'une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité posée à l'occasion du présent pourvoi, le Conseil constitutionnel, par une décision du 26 mars 2021, a décidé que la répression administrative prévue

  1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 16 and 19 did not appeal to the Constitutional Court.