CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001926105
27 janvier 2009
The Court notes that the judgment in favour of the applicant became enforceable on 1 June 2004 and was enforced on 27 April 2005, that is less than eleven months after the judgment had become enforceable
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56119
7 octobre 2002
the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fuentes Bobo case delivered on 29 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224999
3 mai 2023
While in Sofia Prison, the applicant became president of the Bulgarian Prisoners’ Rehabilitation Association, founded in 2012 by prisoners and former prisoners to defend their rights.
ECLI:CEDH:001-108096
2 décembre 2011
execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-71066
12 octobre 2005
”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Lucà case delivered on 27   February   2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-69963
18 juillet 2005
xa0; Having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the cases De Biagi and Forcellini, delivered on 15 July 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56289
20 octobre 2003
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the F.R. case delivered on 28   June   2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326DEC004647219
26 mars 2024
Subsequently, in August 2018, the applicant in that case had lodged another individual application after her second criminal conviction had become final.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC003281607
10 janvier 2012
The applicants eventually became co ‑ owners of the house, which is currently registered in their name. 4 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331JUD005196212
31 mars 2015
In this regard, the Government further alleged that the applicants should have applied to the Constitutional Court, as the judgment became final after 23 September 2012. 15.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC002040216
4 juin 2024
    By a judgment of 23 April 2001, the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant’s appeal on points of law and his conviction became final. The judgment in Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0112DEC001657502
12 janvier 2006
The judgment was given on 29   January 1998, but only became effective in April 1998.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113378
3 septembre 2012
In March 1996 the applicant became a judge in a District Court in Donetsk.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD007659411
9 juillet 2019
or should have become aware that the entry had been made (Article 49). 16.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0410REP002091992
10 avril 1996
s death in 1985, the applicants had become heirs to L.'s estate.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0904JUD006891910
4 septembre 2014
Subsequently, it became clear that the 2007 case did not pose a problem of retroactivity and therefore did not affect the outcome of the applicant’s constitutional complaint.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216080
10 février 2022
By a High Court judgment of 10 October 2019, which became final on 12   March 2020, the applicant was convicted of, inter alia , attempted manslaughter, committed in July 2018.
ECLI:CEDH:001-248647
17 décembre 2025
Under the legal framework in force at the relevant time, a civil servant became eligible for a retirement bonus upon completion of 25 full years of service.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1108JUD004184204
8 novembre 2007
On 7   July 2003 the Kaluga Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal and it became enforceable. 9.     On 11 December 2003 the applicant received the lump sum.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0505JUD001423105
5 mai 2015
    The judgment became final in September 2004. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 17.
Page 44 sur 1474