CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003084405
13 janvier 2009
Violation of P1-1;Pecuniary damage - reserved;Non-pecuniary damage - reserved
Page 44 sur 849
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001560102
18 mars 2008
They maintained that the press had played a major role in the case involving their family as they “presented the facts and judgments tendentiously, causing de facto damage to the plaintiffs.”
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2024
17 juin 2008
Article 41 – EUR 3,000 in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR 12,000 for non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD002189902
Violation of Art. 2;Pecuniary damage - award;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CEDH:002-1972
17 juillet 2008
A claim for damages by the applicant in the civil courts was dismissed because of a lack of firm evidence that her patient records had been unlawfully consulted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108JUD001935303
8 janvier 2008
Violation of Art. 10;Pecuniary damage - award;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CEDH:002-2305
The Principal Public Prosecutor’s assistant instituted proceedings against the applicant company, its editor Mr Bilgiç and Mrs Kurtay, seeking compensation for the non-pecuniary damage sustained as a result
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302JUD005582800
2 mars 2006
Pecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0722JUD003771097
22 juillet 2004
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD002051103
The controller was responsible for protecting personal data and had as a matter of strict liability to compensate any damage caused.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706JUD003649805
6 juillet 2010
Damage 64.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD002272908
4 février 2020
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD007444114
1 octobre 2019
She partly agreed with the Government’s request, but argued that the revision should not have a decisive influence on the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519JUD001729510
19 mai 2015
The Court also decided to award the applicant 5,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1028JUD001195016
28 octobre 2021
As regards application no. 18397/16, the Court also decided to award the applicant 3,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD001735303
26 novembre 2009
Violation of P1-1;Pecuniary damage - award;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016JUD005023606
16 octobre 2018
The Court also decided to award the applicant 15,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD004330107
22 septembre 2020
The Court further decided to award the applicant 6,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0930JUD002079906
30 septembre 2010
Damage 1. Pecuniary damage 60.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD004805306
11 janvier 2022
Russia ) 67,600 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage, and EUR 3,000 jointly for costs and expenses, to be paid directly to the applicants’ representative, and dismissed the remainder of their claims