In the leading case of N.T. v.

    In the leading case of Nechay v. Ukraine (no. 15360/10, 1 July 2021) the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Akhundov v. Azerbaijan, no. 39941/07, 3   February 2011; Jafarli and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 36079/06, 29 July 2010; and Faber Firm and Jafarov v.

    In the leading cases of Spahić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, §§ 25-31, 14 November 2017, and Kunić and Others v.

    In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v. Ukraine (no. 23786/02, 30   November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    In the leading case of Rutkowski and Others v.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

In the Court’s view, leaving the secret surveillance operation to the sole discretion of law enforcement authorities, the domestic law failed to provide adequate safeguards against various possible abuses

    In the leading case of Foundation Hostel for Students of the Reformed Church and Stanomirescu v.

    The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points

    In the leading case of Barta and Drajkó v.

    In the leading cases of Kauczor v. Poland, no. 45219/06, 3   February 2009 and Celejewski v.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    The applicant also claimed EUR 1,333.40 for the costs and expenses incurred before the Constitutional Court (as regards the proceedings leading to the decision of 2005) and the Court. 24.