The Court also decided to award the applicant 2,400 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction. 3.

The Court also decided to award the applicants 12,500 euros (EUR) each in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction. 3.

Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient

(b)     Non-pecuniary damage Reiterating that there was no express provision of the Convention for awards of non-pecuniary damage, the Court referred to the principles set out in a number of

Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Russia (IV) - 39611/18 Judgment 14.10.2025 [Section II] Article 41 Just satisfaction Award of non-pecuniary damages to applicant Government, for the benefit of identified victims of multiple Convention

Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Violation of Art. 10;Pecuniary damage - award;Non-pecuniary damage - award

xa0;   In the above-mentioned judgment, the Court decided to award the first and the second applicants 4,000 euros (EUR) each, and the third to sixth applicants EUR 5,000 each for non-pecuniary damage

and Sariye Metin were the heirs of the deceased applicant Mr   Mahmut Erdin, and requested that they receive the sum of compensation awarded to Mr   Mahmut Erdin for non ‑ pecuniary damage

The Court also decided to award each applicant 2,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 350 to one of the applicants, Mr   Aleksandr Albertovich Nosov, for costs and expenses and dismissed

The Court also decided to award the applicant 3,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 850 for costs and expenses and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction. 3.

Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Article 41: Awards to the first applicant of EUR   7,200 in respect of pecuniary damage and EUR   3,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

Accordingly, she had suffered certain pecuniary damage, although this damage could not be technically quantified in terms of monthly salaries for the entire term of service of a member of parliament.

They also considered that the claim in respect of non-pecuniary damage was highly excessive. 10.

    Criteria to be applied for an award of just satisfaction for non ‑ pecuniary damage 73.

euros (EUR) each to Meryem Çelik, Zübeyda Uysal, Misrihan Sevli, Emine Çelik, Marya Çelik, Fatma Şengül, Besna Sevli, Hanife İzci, Kimet Şengül, Hazima Çelik and Şekirnaz İnan in respect of pecuniary damage

    Under Article 41 of the Convention the applicant sought just satisfaction of 90,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 4.