The document contained the following statement made by the applicant: “I have nothing to do with Ch.’s murder; [I] have no comments as regards [my] arrest.” 11 .

have been victims of attempted rape.

In particular, he observed that no authorisation was required for an examining officer to have resort to the Schedule 7 powers; the examining officer did not have to consider the use of those powers expedient

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

Putter and Mr Johannes Alexandrov Putter, are Bulgarian nationals who were born in 1930, 1954 and 1966, respectively, and live in Plovdiv.

    The Court has previously accepted that close relatives of applicants who have died can maintain applications that include complaints concerning various aspects of Article   6 of the

Furthermore, a request to that effect appears to have featured in his preliminary statement of appeal. 38.

She should also have sought prior assessment of the length of the proceedings against the company by “some judicial body or by a qualified judicial panel”. 22.

Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,

Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   George Nicolaou,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Austria (No. 2), The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Ksenija

xa0; October 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Alexandre , avocat,   Counsel . The Court heard addresses by Miss Picard, Mr Bourgoin, Mr Weitzel and Mr Alexandre, and also replies to questions put by it and by one of its members.

    The Government contended that the applicant could have lodged an appeal under Law no. 29/1990 (see paragraph 36 above) and that she could have asked to be represented by a lawyer, but she

As a consequence the applicants, up to the year 2006, allegedly lost approximately 40-50% of what their salaries would have been if adjusted.

Mrs Karaviotou could have also lodged an appeal against the IPC's decision before the “TRNC” High Administrative Court.

The court relied, inter   alia , on expert opinion which concluded that the first applicant was better suited to have custody. K.T. does not appear to have appealed against the judgment. 13.