CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1623
10 mars 2009
a single-publication rule, such that only the first publication of an article posted on the Internet could give rise to a cause of action in defamation and not any subsequent downloads by Internet readers
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-589755-593646
18 juillet 2002
chairs of the regional party branches of the Austrian Social Democratic Party ( Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs - SPÖ) and the Austrian Peoples’ Party ( Österreichische Volkspartei - ÖVP) - Mr Rezar
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159144
9 novembre 2015
relevant part of Article 23 of the Croatian Constitution ( Ustav Republike Hrvatske , Official Gazette nos. 56/1990, 135/1997, 8/1998, 113/2000, 124/2000, 28/2001, 41/2001, 55/2001, 76/2010, 85/2010) reads
ECLI:CEDH:002-7647
11 juillet 2013
The trial court relied on statements B. had made at his own trial which were read out at the applicant’s trial and rejected an application for B. to be cross examined.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9592
15 juillet 2014
When read in conjunction with that Law, Article 223(1) of the Criminal Code conveyed to the ordinary reader all the necessary constituent elements of the two criminal offences relating to the functioning
ECLI:CEDH:001-146928
10 septembre 2014
The applicant complains under Article 14, read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention, that that she was a victim of discrimination on account of her health status.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC003328912
31 mai 2016
Under Article 8, read in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, he further complained that German law does not provide an effective remedy for expediting protracted court proceedings in family
ECLI:CEDH:001-211543
6 juillet 2021
In the negative, did this treatment amount to a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-164549
8 juin 2016
The decision read as follows: “The criminal investigation against T. was initiated on 23 October 2008...
ECLI:CEDH:003-68059-68527
1 mars 1999
  Summary of the facts     The applicant was sentenced by a National Security Court to one year, eight months’ imprisonment and a fine for having drafted a message that was read out at a
ECLI:CEDH:002-4798
17 juillet 2003
The same day, he read out extracts of the conversations at a court hearing. The transcripts were made available to the parties immediately afterwards.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4058
25 janvier 2005
As part of a group of twenty-five persons, they gathered in front of a secondary school in Izmir in 1995; the chairperson read out a text from the trade union, criticising the treatment meted out to certain
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244973
3 septembre 2025
case and to the violations established on account of the deficiencies in response of the criminal justice system to allegations of hate crime (violation of Article 3 and Article 14 of the Convention read
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-116375
6 décembre 2012
The applicant complained that the decision of the High Court to consider his appeal by way of review and not by way of re-hearing was in violation of Article 6 read in conjunction with Article 14 of the
ECLI:CEDH:002-9073
21 novembre 2013
The domestic courts rejected his claim, finding that the applicant had not been directly affected by the publication: his father was not directly mentioned in the text, and it was not possible to read
ECLI:CEDH:001-192097
6 mars 2019
The applicants complain under Article 9, read in conjunction with Article   11 of the Convention, that the interruption and termination of their religious service by the police constituted an interference
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0529DEC002809603
29 mai 2007
THE LAW Article 37 of the Convention, as far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10870
23 février 2016
reasonable justification – Immigration control measures, which may be found to be compatible with Article 8 §   2, could nevertheless amount to unjustified discrimination in breach of Article   14 read
ECLI:CEDH:002-11968
30 janvier 2018
Law – Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   2 of Protocol No.
6e Section - 1re Chambre
DTA_2326419_20240426
26 avril 2024
Rezard, rapporteur, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.
Page 46 sur 1410
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.