CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

28 196 résultats pour « Rezad »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1623

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2009

10 mars 2009

a single-publication rule, such that only the first publication of an article posted on the Internet could give rise to a cause of action in defamation and not any subsequent downloads by Internet readers

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-589755-593646

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2002

18 juillet 2002

chairs of the regional party branches of the Austrian Social Democratic Party ( Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs - SPÖ) and the Austrian Peoples’ Party ( Österreichische Volkspartei - ÖVP) - Mr Rezar

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159144

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2015

9 novembre 2015

relevant part of Article 23 of the Croatian Constitution ( Ustav Republike Hrvatske , Official Gazette nos. 56/1990, 135/1997, 8/1998, 113/2000, 124/2000, 28/2001, 41/2001, 55/2001, 76/2010, 85/2010) reads

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7647

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2013

11 juillet 2013

The trial court relied on statements B. had made at his own trial which were read out at the applicant’s trial and rejected an application for B. to be cross examined.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9592

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2014

15 juillet 2014

When read in conjunction with that Law, Article 223(1) of the Criminal Code conveyed to the ordinary reader all the necessary constituent elements of the two criminal offences relating to the functioning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146928

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2014

10 septembre 2014

The applicant complains under Article 14, read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention, that that she was a victim of discrimination on account of her health status.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC003328912

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

Under Article 8, read in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, he further complained that German law does not provide an effective remedy for expediting protracted court proceedings in family

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211543

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

In the negative, did this treatment amount to a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164549

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2016

8 juin 2016

The decision read as follows: “The criminal investigation against T. was initiated on 23 October 2008...

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68059-68527

Admin. suprême

1 mars 1999

1 mars 1999

  Summary of the facts     The applicant was sentenced by a National Security Court to one year, eight months’ imprisonment and a fine for having drafted a message that was read out at a

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4798

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2003

17 juillet 2003

The same day, he read out extracts of the conversations at a court hearing. The transcripts were made available to the parties immediately afterwards.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4058

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2005

25 janvier 2005

As part of a group of twenty-five persons, they gathered in front of a secondary school in Izmir in 1995; the chairperson read out a text from the trade union, criticising the treatment meted out to certain

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244973

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2025

3 septembre 2025

case and to the violations established on account of the deficiencies in response of the criminal justice system to allegations of hate crime (violation of Article 3 and Article 14 of the Convention read

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-116375

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2012

6 décembre 2012

The applicant complained that the decision of the High Court to consider his appeal by way of review and not by way of re-hearing was in violation of Article 6 read in conjunction with Article 14 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9073

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2013

21 novembre 2013

The domestic courts rejected his claim, finding that the applicant had not been directly affected by the publication: his father was not directly mentioned in the text, and it was not possible to read

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192097

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2019

6 mars 2019

The applicants complain under Article 9, read in conjunction with Article   11 of the Convention, that the interruption and termination of their religious service by the police constituted an interference

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0529DEC002809603

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2007

29 mai 2007

THE LAW Article 37 of the Convention, as far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10870

Admin. suprême

23 février 2016

23 février 2016

reasonable justification – Immigration control measures, which may be found to be compatible with Article 8 §   2, could nevertheless amount to unjustified discrimination in breach of Article   14 read

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11968

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2018

30 janvier 2018

Law – Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   2 of Protocol No.

Source officielle
TA

6e Section - 1re Chambre

DTA_2326419_20240426

Administratif

26 avril 2024

26 avril 2024

Rezard, rapporteur, a été entendu au cours de l'audience publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Source officielle

Page 46 sur 1410

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.