As to the intended redress to be provided to the applicants, the Government have undertaken to pay them certain amounts of compensation in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages,

He should not have been relegated to eight hours’ tuition a week for six weeks. But I appreciate that others think and have thought that it may be enough to be “effective”.

They further noted that the applicant could have appealed against the investigators’ decisions to the domestic courts or could have claimed civil damages. 2.     The applicant 36.

once they have reached the age of eighteen.

or ought to have knowledge.

He told us: ‘if you have no documents, I can take you through another road where there are no police, but you have to pay EUR 160 each or EUR 320 in total’.

This transfer would have removed the assets from the applicant’s reach and would thus also have prevented G.S., as her partner, from benefiting from them. 7 .

three-month period the Government will pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present case (see table appended), less any amounts which may have

    The certificates from the prison governor did not refer to any data on the basis of which they may have been prepared.

It notes that the Government have also accepted that that this period of the applicant’s detention did not comply with domestic law and considers that it was not “lawful” within the meaning of Article

Also, in accordance with Article 118 of the Code, convicts who have been placed in solitary confinement as a punishment for a breach of prison rules are not allowed to have visits. 39.

    On 25 September 2005 the third applicant applied to have the conviction deleted from his criminal record.

But domestic courts have available a range of remedies for breach of the reasonable time guarantee.

Holding an oral hearing would only have further protracted the proceedings. (b)     The Court’s assessment 55.

I have decided to give my evidence.”

Given that the statutory period for acquiring ownership by adverse possession had elapsed, the applicants claimed to have acquired ownership of the land.

Individuals who have lodged applications with the European Court of Human Rights regarding a similar matter or who have the right to lodge such applications are also entitled to claim compensation. 33.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 that his right of access to a court and his right to have his case heard within a reasonable time had been violated.

The statement had indicated that it was society that was entitled to have images of the defendants.