CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1889911-1984807

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2007

10 janvier 2007

  The applicants   The applicants, Kirk and Lorraine Dickson, are British nationals who were born in 1972 and 1958 respectively.

Source officielle

Page 47 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2999362-3306816

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2010

20 janvier 2010

They were allowed fifteen minutes of confidential talks. The applicant objected to the appointment of the new lawyer, without success.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1915853-2019004

Admin. suprême

7 février 2007

7 février 2007

  The document was sent to the person in charge of the matter at the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs in Berne and copies were sent to 19 other people and certain Swiss diplomatic representatives

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3189455-3546861

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2010

29 juin 2010

    Principal facts The applicants, Isabelle Neulinger and her son Noam Shuruk, are Swiss nationals who were born in 1959 and 2003 respectively and live in Lausanne (Switzerland, Canton of Vaud

Source officielle
CA

Chambre Sociale

63d37b05d1bc2605de4b4c6c

Appel

26 janvier 2023

26 janvier 2023

GOLFALBATRE.COM [Adresse 4] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Isabelle DE THIER, avocat au barreau de ROUEN substitué par Me Philippe FALCONNIER, avocat au barreau de PARIS

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2148626-2282114

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

    The applicants   Vasile Gheorghe Tătar and Paul Tătar, father and son, are Romanian nationals who were born in 1947 and 1979 respectively and who live in Baia Mare (Romania).

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2000453-2109090

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

He considered that certain statements to the press by the party’s president and the party’s programme were in breach of the Constitution and the Law on the regulation of political parties.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2949510-3251688

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2009

2 décembre 2009

  The Strasbourg public prosecutor had received a tip-off from the Musicians Union to the effect that possible infringements of employment law were being committed by the company, so after the concert

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD003797502

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2013

18 avril 2013

According to the applicant, the conditions of detention there were appalling, as the cells were overcrowded and dirty and without a minimum of comfort.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD001325809

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

they were hidden from those who were being observed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC005584812

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

(“the third applicant”), are Croatian nationals who were born in 1974, 2000 and 2002 respectively, and live in Croatia. They were represented before the Court by Ms I.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2031935-2146983

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2007

7 juin 2007

The applicants’ book continued to be published and no copies were seized.   The Paris Court of Appeal upheld the judgment on 16 June 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC003910509

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

    During the hearings held before the Commercial Court, the applicants were represented by a lawyer and were able to put forward all their arguments.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1316824-1373726

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2005

12 avril 2005

They were placed on 17 and 18 October 2002 in a remand prison (“ SIZO” ) in A, a town in the Stavropol region. The place where they were detained between 4 and 17-18 October 2002 remains unknown.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC002080802

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2008

25 novembre 2008

At one moment the applicant needed to go to the toilet and went over to some bushes near the road.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC000227803

Admin. suprême

17 février 2009

17 février 2009

The applicants were then allowed to see their lawyers. On 16 July 1999 the applicants were charged with robbery. On 12 October 1999 Mr Medvedskiy was additionally charged with murder.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD006136212

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

The boy, A.P., went with her. A.     Divorce and custody proceedings in Moldova 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0324JUD002345802

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2011

24 mars 2011

A fire extinguisher and a bloodstained stone, among other objects, were found beside the body and were seized by the police.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156301

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2015

24 juin 2015

(a)     If yes, what were these reasons and were these reasons duly reviewed by the domestic courts?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD002654707

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2013

10 octobre 2013

The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H.

Source officielle