CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-119923
8 février 2010
On 29 May 2008 the Constitutional Court likewise ruled against the applicants without considering the merits of their case.
Page 47 sur 1490
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR01107
10 avril 2018
personne mise en examen, mais aussi aux éléments recueillis sur son patrimoine et sur ses intérêts ; que les juges ajoutent que la discussion sur le quantum éventuel de l'amende encourue et la constitutionnalité
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:C200094
20 janvier 2022
[B] [E] (les consorts [E] et [V]) ont demandé de renvoyer au Conseil constitutionnel une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité portant sur les dispositions de l'article 706-3, dernier alinéa, du code
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709DEC000701119
9 juillet 2024
The case concerns the alleged lack of impartiality of the Constitutional Court in deciding the applicant’s constitutional complaint. 2 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115DEC005781300
15 novembre 2007
On 4 May 1998 the first and third applicant filed a request ( Individualantrag ) with the Constitutional Court ( Verfassungsgerichtshof ) applying for a review of the constitutionality of section 3 § 1
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12160
25 octobre 2018
In its decision, the Constitutional Court noted that Article 460, paragraph 1, of the Civil Code did not prohibit marriage but subjected it to the authorisation of the supervisor, whose refusal
ECLI:CEDH:002-11795
5 décembre 2017
In a decision of 26 March 2012 the Constitutional Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of section 25(3) of the 2006 Act (which covers persons acceding to “public office” or engaging in
ECLI:CEDH:001-186949
20 septembre 2018
On 29 February 2016 the applicant challenged the constitutionality of sections 17 (2) and 19 of the Rules of Parliamentary Procedure before the Constitutional Court ( Satversmes tiesa ).
ECLI:CEDH:001-141827
13 janvier 2011
Complaint about the high-security conditions of detention On 24 August 2004 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221DEC003502197
21 février 2002
On 16 November 1993 the Administrative Court requested the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of section 15 § 1 of the Tirol Land Planning Act ( Flurverfassungslandesgesetz ), which provides
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1108JUD004986819
8 novembre 2021
On 9 April 2020 the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court made a request to the Constitutional Court seeking a ruling on the constitutionality of the interim measures order issued
ECLI:CEDH:001-151145
14 janvier 2015
The Constitutional Court stated: “From the date of publication of the judgment in the Official Journal the presumption of the constitutionality of Article 559, taken together with Article 545 §§
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0628DEC002415794
28 juin 1995
On 24 November 1993 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicant's petition as individuals lack capacity to introduce proceedings on constitutional conflicts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0321DEC003250296
21 mars 2000
It considered that the judgment in the Gradinger case had an impact on the constitutionality of an administrative provision (Section 99 § 6c of the Road Traffic Act) rather than on the constitutionality
ECLI:CEDH:001-231292
1 février 2024
The applicants lodged a constitutional complaint on 13 July 2022 challenging the constitutionality of the government decrees and of Act no. CXXX of 2021.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161285
11 février 2016
Article 147 “The Constitutional Court of Ukraine is the sole body of constitutional jurisdiction in Ukraine.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0306DEC001233786
6 mars 1989
However, the Constitutional Court rejected these complaints on 5 March 1986.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607JUD005191419
7 juin 2022
The Ministry also referred to the Constitutional Court’s finding that under the Constitution a person’s belief cannot form the basis for release from the constitutional obligation to perform mandatory
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611JUD005515916
11 juin 2024
As to the applicant’s conduct after being elected, the Constitutional Court made the following findings: “The [Constitutional] Court notes that at the time he became an MP, Koço Kokëdhima, as a
ECLI:CEDH:002-14009
17 janvier 2023
The applicant company requested the referral of a question for a preliminary ruling as to the constitutionality of Article 225‑3-1 of the Criminal Code , which was the legal basis for the type of