It cannot be ruled out that the ... injuries on the rear of the body could have resulted from [Mr Timin] falling on his back ... He could have caused the injuries on the front of the body himself.

Second, when a conviction is based solely or to a decisive degree on depositions that have been made by a person whom the accused has had no opportunity to examine or to have examined, whether during the

violation of her rights to defend herself in person or through effective legal assistance, to adduce documentary evidence, to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on her behalf and to have

Moldova (application no. 25464/05) The applicant, Alexandru Gavrilovici, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1954 and lives in Palanca (Moldova).

He had not alleged, even in the alternative, that the duration of his compulsory period of service should have been shorter or that he should have paid a smaller fee, but had simply stated that he should

    Justifications which have been deemed “relevant” and “sufficient” reasons in the Court’s case-law have included such grounds as the danger of absconding, the risk of pressure being brought

  Alexandra Maria Popescu v. Romania (no. 9684/04) Emilian Ştefănescu v. Romania (no. 35018/03) Seceleanu and Others v.

On 8 July 2003, the applicant’s heir, Mr Alessandro Bellini [1] , expressed the wish to continue the proceedings before the Court. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

The applicants are either individuals that have been declared socially dangerous in accordance with Article 1 § 1 (a) and/or (b) of Decree no.

  2 and 3 stated that “no changes have been effected to the ownership” of their properties.

Since it eventually did so, in the applicant’s view, it should have awarded him a much higher amount of compensation. 41.

May same-sex [couples] have the opportunity to found a family and have an official document confirming this. They need the same rights as traditional couples.” 28.

My rights have been violated: I, as a member of the faculty, have been excluded from the procedure which is of great importance both for me and for the university as a whole – the election of the academic

First, the person concerned has to have been convicted of a criminal offence by a final decision and to have suffered punishment as a result of such conviction.

Persons who have the right to lodge an appeal, and the public prosecutor, have the right to be present at the preliminary hearing.

Second, a conviction cannot be based solely or to a decisive degree on depositions that have been made by a person whom the accused has had no opportunity to examine or to have examined, whether during

    In view of the facts of the case, the Court considers that the authorities have failed to do everything in their power that could reasonably have been expected of them in order to secure

Therefore, the applicant could not claim to have been in “possession” of the relevant properties “at any material time” and should have known that he could not enjoy them because of the political situation

In any event, the Belgrade and Kragujevac Courts of Appeal also held that they did not have jurisdiction to decide on the applicants’ cases. 15.