H. and the applicants lived in the first applicant’s flat until 2002. On 3 November 2002 H. went to work and has never returned home.

suivants : au niveau du séjour : volet roulant ne fonctionne pas avec la précision que le tablier a été retiré par le locataire car tournait dans le vides, des lames se détachent, 2 vis dans coffret - boîtier

The statement was admitted in evidence against both applicants.

A suicide letter was found during a search of Andrey Shevchenko’s flat.

the search of the flat.

It found no such flaws and observed that the appeal was neither admissible on any of the admissibility grounds pursuant to Article 238 of the Code.

M., the applicant’s mother, also lived in the same flat. In October 2005 Ms O.

A0289 of 20/03/2017 (multiple healing hematomas on both legs).

She was then well informed that it was precisely the matters regarding her son which was the reason for the Board’s request for confirmation that he would not move into the flat. 34.

I was arrested, detained in a psychiatric cell, my flat was provocatively searched for ‘drugs’, my telephone calls were tapped, a car damaged.

    In February 2009 the cooperative which owns the flat initiated proceedings before the Košice I District Court with a view to having the applicant removed from the flat.

The first applicant was granted interim custody of the child and parental responsibility was granted to both parents jointly.

Before the Commission, both are represented by Mr. K. Vavrovsky, a lawyer practising in Salzburg.

Both applicants are represented before the Court by Tyndallwoods, a firm of solicitors based in Birmingham.

However, neither the applicant nor his lawyer had informed the Court of this significant change in the mode of representation, although both of them were required to do so.

  A flat in Bucharest which the applicant had purchased in 1949 was nationalised by the State in 1950, pursuant to decree number 92/1950.

(Both cases) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Just satisfaction: - first case: question reserved for decision at a later date - second case: no claim made by the applicants within time-limit &#

a judicial investigation into a case of international drug trafficking, Central Investigating Court no. 1 of the Audiencia Nacional was informed that the Archangelos , a vessel flying the Panamanian flag

The living conditions of both parents were satisfactory.

It ordered that the Company purchase for the applicants, before 1 January 2005, a two-room flat in the town of Anapa.