CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:CR01589
12 décembre 2023
PAR CES MOTIFS, la Cour : Sur la première question prioritaire de constitutionnalité : DIT N'Y AVOIR LIEU DE RENVOYER au Conseil constitutionnel la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité ;
Page 48 sur 1490
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316DEC000920519
16 mars 2021
As regards the constitutional complaint 12 .
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145740
25 juin 2014
of the Constitutional Court’s decision in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. 21.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC005274899
22 mai 2001
On 1 August 1994 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint claiming that the decisions of the administrative bodies and the Administrative Court violated his constitutional rights.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD001227803
7 juillet 2009
At a later stage in the proceedings the Panevėžys Regional Court referred the case to the Constitutional Court for a ruling on the constitutionality of the Government decrees on the basis
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD007210514
3 octobre 2017
On an unknown date T.S. appealed to the Constitutional Court, to which he submitted the question of the constitutionality of Article 1817 § 1 of the Civil Code, pursuant to Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD000523104
7 octobre 2010
First, they submitted that the applicant should have requested the domestic courts to refer the case to the Constitutional Court to determine the constitutionality of the legislative acts which were the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213DEC001150418
13 décembre 2022
The court further noted that the Constitutional Court had recently upheld the constitutionality of mandatory vaccination for the purposes of protection of the health of children and had held that parents
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929JUD004361006
29 septembre 2009
of constitutional rights and freedoms.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146074
11 juillet 2014
Constitutional proceedings (a) Complaint by A. 18.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113077
6 juin 2007
The question of the constitutionality of the Act is currently reviewed by the Constitutional Court. On 30 June 2006 Notice no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1013DEC001759290
13 octobre 1993
On 11 December 1987, the Austrian Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) refused to admit the constitutional complaint for decision on its merits.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC005381800
1 février 2005
The Constitutional Court took up four of the complaints, not including the one lodged by the first applicant, and, on 27 November 1996, introduced ex-officio proceedings for the review of the constitutionality
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CR00662
1 juin 2022
lesquels la loi autorise une garde à vue de plus de quarante-huit heures ; que la déclaration d'inconstitutionnalité sollicitée dans le mémoire distinct portant sur la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité
ECLI:CEDH:001-169059
3 novembre 2016
Furthermore, the Constitutional Court observed that its own judgments in case nos. IV. US 70/11 and IV.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106JUD003493204
6 janvier 2011
On an unspecified date, a number of members of the Seimas requested the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of the amendment to the Presidential Elections Act, arguing that
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11214
2 juin 2016
In the present case, the question raised by the applicant as to the constitutionality of the relevant provision had already been resolved and was the subject of abundant case-law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117DEC005480515
17 janvier 2023
Article 50, Article 53 § 1, Article 58 § 1, Article 61 and Article 62 of this Act provide, inter alia , that the Constitutional Court may, of its own motion, assess the constitutionality
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-79172
20 décembre 2006
The applicant's appeal to the Constitutional Court was dismissed as manifestly ill-founded as the Regional Court's decision was in conformity with the law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC007128712
15 avril 2014
Moreover, she could have filed a constitutional complaint under section 27 of the Act on the Constitutional Court challenging the constitutionality of the decision of the Budapest Regional Court.