CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118JUD000000708
18 novembre 2008
The total number of Moldovans who have obtained Romanian citizenship since 1991 is unknown as the Romanian Government have never made it public.
Page 49 sur 100
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD002265308
28 avril 2016
It established that Mr I.A., who knew that the lorry could have been confiscated, had sold it to the company M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602JUD004595909
2 juin 2016
Moreover, although it was not possible for him in law to propose that the case be transferred to another competent court, and such a proposal would have been rejected as inadmissible, he could have asked
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD001173706
2 mai 2013
The lawyer should have access to all the materials, and have the right to challenge the evidence, before the court ...” THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD001300613
18 septembre 2014
Only a bookkeeping expert could have established the facts concerning her debts. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD007271301
29 mars 2005
And if our “green” democracy has to have “the mumps”, the earlier the better: the acquired immunity would be stronger, as children's diseases have to be contracted in childhood.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624JUD000498624
24 juin 2025
However, the parties have not informed the Court about any subsequent decisions which may have altered the contact arrangements put in place.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD003670597
22 juin 2010
As the applicant was born in 1955, he did not have a reasonable expectation to be living with his family in the same house up to the present time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001625990
22 septembre 2009
The Court notes that since 1974 the applicants have been unable to gain access to and to use that home.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC003000905
11 octobre 2011
The applicant complained under Article 6 that she did not have access to a tribunal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD003465304
26 juin 2012
Alternatively, the applicant considered that the appeal court should have decided on the issue of his participation in the appeal hearing before the actual hearing, which would have allowed him, when working
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD002298009
5 décembre 2013
However, whereas those provisions apply to appellants who are not members of the Bar, but have passed the Bar exam and whereas they have to prove their eligibility and attach a copy of the Bar exam to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002256709
23 juin 2016
However, on the particular facts of this case, I would have been comfortable in finding that Article 10 was indeed applicable and that an interference occurred.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0209JUD006004213
9 février 2017
In addition, the issue as to whether domestic remedies have been exhausted is normally determined by reference to the date when the application was lodged with the Court (see Baumann v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0306JUD003153509
6 mars 2014
The applicant could only have a shower once a week for fifteen minutes. A small 60-watt lamp was installed above the cell door.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD006456909
16 juin 2015
It is worth noting that there have been cases in the Estonian courts where authors have been punished for the contents of a comment ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601DEC002470516
1 juin 2017
In doing so, the judge had to consider the concrete effect that the information requested would have on the proceedings and could admit only new evidence which could possibly have an impact on the final
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309
26 novembre 2013
resolved to conclude a Convention to this effect, and have agreed upon the following provisions – ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD005957708
6 mars 2012
Therefore, it had been guaranteed that the file had not contained evidence vindicating the applicant which the prosecutor could have concealed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD007810314
31 janvier 2019
Because of his suicide attempts and mental condition, her son should have been under medical supervision and the hospital staff should have prevented him from leaving the hospital grounds.