CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD004135598
22 juin 2010
16219/90, § 20, 31 July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20 January 2009) or at a later stage.
Page 49 sur 58
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD003521497
26 octobre 2010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD000526908
16 janvier 2014
On 17 July 2006 the Simonovskiy Inter-District Prosecutor’s Office refused to institute a criminal investigation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD002178007
3 juillet 2012
On 5 December 2006 the Rīga City Vidzeme District Court examined an application made by the applicant on 17 October 2006 to postpone the start of the execution of her prison sentence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD002083718
14 juin 2022
In the case of Alexandru-Radu Luca v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD000533507
6 mars 2012
Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Nina Vajić, President, Peer Lorenzen, Elisabeth Steiner, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD001559014
22 octobre 2015
Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: András Sajó, President, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Julia Laffranque, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD002208907
The agencies included the Republican Department of the Ministry of the Interior, Centre T of the Main Department of the Ministry of the Interior, various district departments of the Ministry of the Interior
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315JUD004357218
15 mars 2022
In 1986 the applicant was appointed as judge of the Trzcianka District Court, and subsequently as judge of the Poznań Regional Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1025JUD005508013
25 octobre 2018
Italy, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President, Kristina Pardalos, Guido Raimondi, Krzysztof
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0610JUD004112017
10 juin 2025
On 27 December 2005 the “TRNC” Famagusta District Court held that the properties listed in the plaintiffs’ submissions belonged to the Abdullah Paşa religious foundation. 29.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0223JUD004631799
23 février 2006
The applicants alleged that Mr Zahari Alexandrov Stefanov, a person of Roma ethnic origin, de facto spouse of the first applicant and son of the second applicant, had died as a result of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD001608190
27 mai 2010
16219/90, § 20, 31 July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20 January 2009).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002068092
15 novembre 1996
Katranis, Mr Vasiliki Katrani, Mrs Athina Sanopoulou, Mrs Konstantina Kagka, Mrs Ekaterini Stylianidou, Mr Georgios Koutsos, Mrs Magdalini Georgiadou, Mrs Despoina Gontsia, Mr Ioannis Tsekmes, Mrs Alexandra
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC007679513
19 avril 2016
Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 19 April 2016 as a Chamber composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President, Ledi Bianku, Kristina Pardalos, Linos-Alexandre
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD004675599
24 novembre 2009
The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v. Turkey (no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20 January 2009), and should be dismissed for the same reasons. II.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1736176-1823760
20 juillet 2006
In February 2002 Agro-Ros Ltd successfully brought proceedings against the Smilyanskiy District Council and each of the applicants, challenging the Council’s decision to provide the applicants with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840391
27 janvier 2009
The applicant lived with her family in Kalogrea, a village in the District of Kyrenia.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003997098
22 septembre 2009
The first and second applicants alleged that they had lived with their children in Ayios Amvrosios, a village in the District of Kyrenia (northern Cyprus), where the first applicant owned
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840491
The Court observes that these objections were identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v. Turkey (no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20 January 2009), and should be dismissed for the same reasons.