CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC002983407

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

The judgment became final on 19 June 2006 and was enforced on 19 October 2009.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330DEC002675210

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2021

30 mars 2021

Bearing in mind that the applicants had already brought on 19 and 27 April 2005 their first actions for compensation in relation to the explosion in question, the court held that they must have become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD000087803

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

That part of the judgment of 18   December 2001 was upheld on appeal on 5 March 2002 and, accordingly, became final and binding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD002992005

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2014

1 juillet 2014

The judgment became final on 14 September 2002. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612DEC004171005

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2018

12 juin 2018

The minority shareholder consequently became the 100% shareholder of the tobacco company. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD000299303

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2007

7 juin 2007

The judgment was not appealed against and became final. 7.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1185370-1242579

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2004

18 novembre 2004

This decision was not appealed and became final on 1 March 2001.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0418REP001995892

Admin. suprême

18 avril 1996

18 avril 1996

s death in 1984, the applicants had become heirs to P.'s estate.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC001998513

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2013

1 octobre 2013

Where, therefore, an applicant avails himself of an apparently existing remedy and only subsequently becomes aware of circumstances which render the remedy ineffective, it may be appropriate for the purposes

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1627450-1706697

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2006

28 mars 2006

Eurogold Madencilik (which subsequently became known as Normandy Madencilik A.Ş. ) obtained the right to prospect for gold.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1636723-1714833

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

  He became eligible for parole on 5 July 1979 after 15 years in prison. Between 1985 and 1998 Mr Léger made numerous applications for release, all of which were refused.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1879196-1977405

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2006

19 décembre 2006

On 28 June 2000 the Court of Cassation ruled that the prosecution had become time-barred.

Source officielle
TJ

Chambre 26 / Proxi fond

66b3b55071e198c2b66a2da0

T. Judiciaire

15 juillet 2024

15 juillet 2024

de réinstallation ;condamner la SARL BECAP STARVIA à lui payer la somme de 10 000 € à titre de dommages-intérêts pour préjudice de jouissance ;condamner la SARL BECAP STARVIA à lui payer la somme de 15

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0226DEC001930104

Admin. suprême

26 février 2008

26 février 2008

On 11 June 1992 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the employer requesting the then Gevgelija Municipal Court, which later became the Court of First Instance (“the first-instance court”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-113856

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2012

26 septembre 2012

Government of the Netherlands (‘the Government’) to pay the applicant €1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable, within three months of the date on which the judgment becomes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56167

Admin. suprême

24 février 2003

24 février 2003

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Riepan case delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56320

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the 13 cases listed in the Appendix to this resolution, delivered on 28 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56321

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the 13 cases listed in the Appendix to this resolution, delivered on 28 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68972

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2005

25 avril 2005

to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Krone Verlag GmbH &   CoKG No. 2 delivered on 6 November 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68974

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2005

25 avril 2005

to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Krone Verlag GmbH &   CoKG No. 3 delivered on 11 December 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle

Page 49 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →