It reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

    On the starting page a picture of graves was shown and the text underneath read “then: Holocaust”.

She invokes Article 3 of the Convention which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

The report was then finalised and it was read and signed by the witness.

Article 442, in so far as relevant, reads: “1.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONVENTION, READ IN CONJUCTION WITH ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION 16.

It reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

It considered that the Salzburger Nachrichten was a “quality newspaper” and the Neue Kronenzeitung was not, and that this difference was not necessarily known to readers.

This document, which was written entirely by hand, read as follows: “Liepāja, 20 July 2000 11.30 a.m.

Article 8 of the Convention reads as follows: “1.     Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

One of the patients, ST, died before the trial, but had made a statement to the police prior to her death which was read to the jury.

      Moreover, the applicant has complained that he has been the victim of a violation of Article 14 (art. 14) of the Convention read in conjunction with Articles 6, 8 and 13

Thus, the prosecutor requested permission to read out statements made by the witness to the police and during a previous preliminary court session.

  This rule applies not only to statements made in the same proceedings but also to those made in other proceedings and, in this last case, the statements may not even be read without the consent

The orginal text read as follows: “… It appears that the proceedings are pending before the Olsztyn Regional Court”. [6] .     Rectified on 14 March 2012.

    The Hegnar Online website featured a forum where readers could start debates and submit comments.

On 17 October 2007 records of examination of witnesses in Montenegro were read at the trial.

The relevant parts of the High Court's judgment reads as follows:   (Translation)     "In this case, which has been tried by a jury, an indictment of 23 November 1994 was served on [the

The Court finds that the instant complaint falls to be examined under Article 5 of the Convention which reads in its relevant parts as follows: “1.