CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1699
8 janvier 2009
The authorities had chosen to apply the strict measures prescribed under the domestic law rather than to allow a more flexible approach depending on the particular risk presented by the prisoner and the
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-219836
13 septembre 2022
6 and Article 8 of the Convention that, despite the fact that her claim was deemed well-founded and she was awarded compensation for the damages sustained, the costs she was ordered to pay to the defending
ECLI:CEDH:002-10554
22 septembre 1994
made dependent on the fulfilment of unduly formalistic conditions — it is for the courts to ensure that a trial is fair and, accordingly, that counsel who attends trial for the apparent purpose of defending
ECLI:CEDH:002-9434
25 février 1997
officer central to prosecution and closely linked to prosecuting authorities – inter alia he decided which charges should be brought, convened court martial, appointed members and prosecuting and defending
ECLI:CEDH:002-5747
1 mars 2001
Article 6 § 3 (a) and (b) – The applicant was not aware that the Regional Court might reclassify his offence as fraud and this certainly impaired his chances of defending himself in respect of the charges
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC001121503
19 juin 2007
of the Regional Court quashed the judgment of 7   June   1999 following a protest instituted by the Deputy President of the Supreme Court and remitted the case for a fresh consideration, demanding
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1115DEC004818899
15 novembre 2001
His main complaint was that he had been prevented from defending himself.
Chambre de vacations PC
6a0f921ecdc6046d4780c52c
13 avril 2026
Christian DEFENDINI, conseil COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Lors des débats : Mme Isabel VIGIER, président Mme Aude WALTER, juge M.
REFERES
69c02959cdc6046d478f7c6c
27 octobre 2025
greffier associé, A comparu : La Société de droit Allemend UNION TANK ECKSTEIN GMBH & CO.KG [Adresse 1] Allemagne Demanderesse au référé, Concluant par ADVEN AARPI, représenté par maître Claire DERRENDINGER
ECLI:CEDH:002-1374
16 juillet 2009
unilateral declaration was a sufficient basis for the Court to conclude that there was no need for it to examine the case any further in order to protect the human rights enshrined in the Convention: depending
ECLI:CEDH:002-218
21 janvier 1999
It was for the courts to ensure that a trial was fair and, accordingly, that counsel who attended trial for the apparent purpose of defending the accused in his absence was given the opportunity to do
ECLI:CEDH:002-14229
10 octobre 2023
The remedy, therefore, depending on the circumstances, could also lead to the punishment of the official who had made the impugned statement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223DEC000497303
23 février 2010
Following verbal attacks by the applicant, the judge granted the lawyer's request to be excused from the duty of defending the applicant. The hearing was adjourned until 29 November 2002.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4974
13 février 2003
In short, the option of defending his case unaided, in proceedings in which he would have had to face a legal practitioner, did not afford the applicant the right to access to a court in conditions such
ECLI:CEDH:001-191423
6 février 2019
It was concerned, inter alia , with the existence of different legal entitlements for persons with the same disabilities depending on whether or not their impairment was war-related, and recommended that
ECLI:CEDH:002-9281
28 janvier 2014
The Court emphasised, however, that its position might be subject to review in the future depending, in particular, on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent case-law in line with the Convention
ECLI:CEDH:002-10552
ECLI:CEDH:002-4679
28 octobre 2003
Moreover, the threat of ex post facto review of his statements could have a “chilling effect” on the exercise of the applicant’s professional duties and in defending the interests of his clients in the
ECLI:CEDH:002-2859
13 février 2007
notion has a special importance in Germany because of the country’s experience during the Third Reich, and the Federal Republic’s constitution was based on the principle of a “democracy capable of defending
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC004379798
29 janvier 2004
Therefore, the applicant could not be said to have been defending a socially justified interest, as she had been trying to achieve her private objective.
Page 5 sur 217
DERRENDINGER
12/08/2021
Voir →
10/12/2020
12/12/2019
31/01/2019