CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-119410
10 avril 2013
In December 2004 the applicant, a retired military officer, instituted proceedings in the Simferopol Garrison Military Court against the local Military Enlistment Office seeking to oblige the latter to
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC003335907
17 novembre 2009
The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of the judgment of 26   February 2002 given by the Rivne Garrison Military
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609JUD002767007
9 juin 2020
Her claims were examined by the 26 th Garrison Military Court in Baykonur in open hearings held in her presence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914JUD000479222
14 septembre 2023
On 29/11/2021 the Rostov-on-Don Garrison Court rejected the appeal against the refusal as unsubstantiated/upheld on 11/02/2022 by the Southern Military Circuit Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC006022309
18 février 2014
  In 1972 the applicants moved to a flat in Pula owned by the Yugoslav Peoples’ Army (“the YPA”) on the basis of a handwritten note signed by Ɖ.V., allegedly the person authorised by the YPA Garrison
ECLI:CEDH:001-173327
3 avril 2017
    On 23 November 2011 the applicant was removed from the personnel list of the military investigative department of the Rostov Garrison without being provided additional and principal paid
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422DEC006002211
22 avril 2021
    On 10 March 2010 the President of the Military Court of the Kyiv Garrison issued an order addressed to the enforcement office for immediate enforcement of the sentence of 21 December 2009
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD000395914
18 janvier 2022
    On 10 September 2012 the 35th Garrison Military Court (“the Garrison Court”) found that S.Kh. had been subjected to hazing rituals in his military unit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322DEC003602002
22 mars 2011
On 8 June 1999 the Khabarovsk Garrison Military Court (“the Khabarovsk Court”) ruled in the applicant’s favour.
ECLI:CEDH:001-118370
12 mars 2013
On 21 July 2006 the Military Court of the Vladivostok Garrison dismissed the applicant’s claim for three years’ parental leave as having no basis in domestic law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC003693307
24 mars 2015
years 2   months and 14   days 6,000   8528/08* 16/11/2007 Georgiy Svyatoslavovich SYROMYATNIKOV 20/05/1978 Vladikavkaz   On 6 April 2004 the Military Court of the Vladikavkaz Garrison
ECLI:CEDH:001-123819
8 juillet 2013
On 21 April 2004 the Military Court of the Moscow Garrison confirmed the decision of 22 July 2002.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD006585901
7 décembre 2006
    On 25 January 2000 the case was brought before the Makhachkala Garrison Military Court ( Махачкалинский гарнизонный военный суд ), presided over by judge R. i.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1363403-1427354
7 juin 2005
  When he was authorised to leave hospital Mr Kılınç travelled to his village instead of returning to garrison duty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1011DEC003689404
11 octobre 2007
According to the materials of the case, the applicants were transported from their military unit to the Martakert Garrison Military Prosecutor's Office on 21 April 2004.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD007663511
23 juin 2020
    In September 2010 the first applicant’s complaint was sent for examination to the Pyatigorsk Military Garrison Court. 47 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1012JUD003636904
12 octobre 2006
As this compensation remained unpaid, in 2002 he instituted proceedings in the Dnipropetrovs'k Garrison Military Tribunal against his former employer, a military unit, seeking recovery of the debt. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1205DEC007809914
5 décembre 2024
    On 12 June 2014 the Warsaw Military Garrison Court ( Wojskowy Sąd Garnizonowy ) dismissed the above-mentioned appeals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0414JUD006069911
14 avril 2022
    As regards the allegedly delayed enforcement of the judgments rendered in the applicant’s favour by the Rostov-on-Don Garrison Military Court on 25 April and 22   December 2006, the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC002202708
23 août 2011
On 22 August 2007 the Military Court of the Nizhniy Tagil Garrison examined the applicant’s appeal against the decision of 19 February 2007 and dismissed it as unfounded.
Page 5 sur 23