CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

98 résultats pour « Haciali DOLLER Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD003610903

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2008

2 octobre 2008

Pour l’heure, force est de constater que notre dessinateur mérite bien mieux que l’hallali à son encontre.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD002873605

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2008

18 décembre 2008

    Having reached that conclusion, the Court does not need to satisfy itself that the other requirements of Article 11 § 2 (legitimate aim and necessity of the interference) have been complied

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD005420408

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2015

29 janvier 2015

Hajili and Mr E. Sadigov, lawyers practising in Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Asgarov. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114JUD004332714

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

Does not bind the Court.   STRASBOURG 14 November 2024   FINAL   14/02/2025   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD003452813

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

Nor did the Government provide any plausible explanation for the failure to do so. 38.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0507JUD003528314

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2020

7 mai 2020

  Hajili, a lawyer based in Strasbourg, and Mrs   Z.   Sadigova, a lawyer practising in Azerbaijan. 2.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr. Ç.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0630JUD002075508

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2022

30 juin 2022

Hajili and Mr   E.   Sadiqov, lawyers based in Strasbourg and Baku respectively. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç.   Əsgərov. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173887

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2017

4 mai 2017

The report does not contain information on the causes and timing of the injury.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC006065908

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

Hajili, lawyers practising in Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Ç.   Asgarov. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0630REP002247993

Admin. suprême

30 juin 1998

30 juin 1998

Ankara State Security Court:   a)   "...Beni baskĸnlar götürür   gerillanĸn şahdamarĸ halkĸma   korkunç ve soylu bir tutkudur dayatma   yalnĸz bu kadar da değil   yarĸn hayali

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0618JUD005907509

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2015

18 juin 2015

The applicant refused to do so. 13.     The applicant was released at 2 a.m. on 23 September 2007; his mobile phone was returned to him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119JUD006082408

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2023

19 janvier 2023

Hajili (who was given leave by the President of the Section to represent the applicant in the proceedings before the Court (Rule 36 § 4 (a) in fine of the Rules of Court)) and Mr E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2014

20 novembre 2014

I do not know how many other people were then walking behind me.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245314

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2025

4 septembre 2025

  Türkiye [GC], no. 15669/20, §§ 237-356, 26 September 2023), the Court does not put any questions to the parties or require any observations on these applications.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218JUD006558313

Admin. suprême

18 février 2021

18 février 2021

  Azerbaijan , nos. 19150/13 and 52022/13, 6 April 2017; and Hajili and Others v. Azerbaijan , nos. 44699/13 and 2 others, 29   June 2017).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0218JUD000025712

Admin. suprême

18 février 2025

18 février 2025

  Hajili, a lawyer based in Strasbourg. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç.   Əsgərov. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD006946012

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2020

10 septembre 2020

In those circumstances, the Court does not see which decision or action by the prosecuting authorities the applicant should have challenged before the domestic courts before lodging his application with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD000538610

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2022

24 mars 2022

  Hajili, a lawyer based in Strasbourg, and Mr E. Sadigov and Mr F. Namazli, lawyers based in Baku. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr Ç. Əsgərov. 4.

Source officielle

Page 5 sur 5

← Précédent