Its precise extent depends on the circumstances of each case, and it must be interpreted so as not to impose an impossible or disproportionate burden on the authorities (see Stasi , § 78-79, and M.C. v

Sentenza del Tribunale di primo grado (Quinta Sezione) del 20 marzo 2001.#Cordis Obst und Gemüse Großhandel GmbH contro Commissione delle Comunità europee.

Bosnia and Herzegovina , no. 22893/05, §§ 69-70, 27 May 2008 (Serbs convicted of war crimes against Bosniacs and kept, unsegregated, in a prison where about ninety per cent of inmates were Bosniacs); Stasi

Sentenza della Corte (grande sezione) del 29 marzo 2011.#Anheuser-Busch Inc. contro Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik.

Sentenza della Corte (Grande Sezione) del 20 marzo 2018.#Commissione europea contro Repubblica d'Austria.

  Marco Briz, of the Saragossa Bar,   Counsel .   The Court heard addresses by Mr Martínez, Mrs   Fernández Sola and Mr   Borrego Borrego.

Szpunar, presentate il 3 marzo 2021.#Repubblica di Moldova contro Komstroy LLC, succeduta alla Energoalians.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dalla Cour d'appel de Paris.

At 10 a.m. he started his protest by installing two large wooden sculptures on the stairs of the Prosecutor General’s Office.

Chegemskiy district court Convicted on 28/09/2012   No information about further proceedings   Yusup Vakhayevich EKTUMAYEV 12/02/1993   65036/14   06/09/2014   Tyumen   Maria

    The first applicant, Mr Toplak, was born in 1937 and lived in Maribor. The second applicant, Mr Mrak, was born in 1983 and lives in Ljubljana. They were represented by Mr S.

Sentenza della Corte (Quinta Sezione) del 19 marzo 2015.#L. Kik contro Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta da Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.

Pasquale De Stasio («   le quatrième requérant   ») et la cinquième (n o 30578/14) par M.

Bobek, presentate il 17 marzo 2016.#European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients contro Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills e Attorney General.

She is represented before the Court by Mr Gleb Glinka and Ms Maria Voskobitova, lawyers practising in Moscow. 3.     In April 2011, Ms Tunikova met D. and they started living together.

Conclusioni dell'avvocato generale Léger del 7 marzo 2000. # The Queen contro Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte First Corporate Shipping Ltd, con la partecipazione

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Jolien Schukking, President,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

15) against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Croatian national, Mr Marino

in Lviv, Lviv region. complete destruction Art. 8 (1) - flight from one’s home as a result of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine - Ms Druzhynina complained that together with her children, Ms Mariia

He placed both items on the stairs of the building, pulled down his trousers and underpants, which according to the applicant were part of the decor, and sat on the seat, pretending to be using it.