There was no arbitrariness as the political statements made by the applicant in public were of such a nature as to raise doubts regarding his agreement with defence policy, and it was irrelevant

    The Court considers, in the light of the parties’ submissions, that the complaint raises serious issues of fact and law under the Convention, the determination of which requires an examination

Hopmann , a lawyer practising in Berlin. 3.     The Government were represented by Ms G. Marok-Wachter, Director, of the Office of Justice of the Principality of Liechtenstein. 4.

European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Josep C asadevall, President ,   Nicolas B ratza,   Giovanni B onello,   Matti P ellonpää,   Rait

Lord Hoffman, who dissented, accepted that there was credible evidence of a threat of serious terrorist attack within the United Kingdom, but considered that it would not destroy the life of the nation

However, and “not without misgivings”, he considered that the relevant authorities, including those of this Court, suggested an irreducible life sentence would not always raise an Article 3 issue. 66 .

It raises a more fundamental issue of principle which was not dealt with in Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333.

]) Représentant : Me Patricia MINAULT de la SELARL MINAULT PATRICIA, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 619 - N° du dossier 20170499 - Représentant : Me Olivier PURCELL du LLP HOLMAN

    The Court observes that it cannot be ruled out that the detention of a person who is ill may raise issues under Article 3 (see Mouisel v. France , no.

    Given that the applications at hand concern similar facts and complaints and raise identical issues under the Convention, the Court decides to join them in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of

However, and “not without misgivings”, he considered that the relevant authorities, including those of this Court, suggested an irreducible life sentence would not always raise an Article 3 issue.

européenne des droits de l’homme (cinquième section), siégeant le 15 septembre 2009 en une chambre composée de   :   Peer Lorenzen, président,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait

On 20 October 2001 M. had sent Arayik Avetisyan to visit his family with the condition that he should bring back 2 litres of homemade vodka and 100 US dollars.

    Lord Hoffmann put his interpretation of the provision in slightly different terms: “Except in cases in which the applicant has been wholly excluded from some sector of the domestic educational

Accordingly, the present case raises an issue concerning the applicant’s right to respect for his private correspondence with his fiancée and the need for effective judicial oversight in this matter. 48

The applicant did not raise further arguments before the Federal Constitutional Court nor did he mention in his constitutional complaint that information on the scope and content of the files held by the

If Mrs Chernoi’s allegation about a connection between her husband and Mr   Loutchansky is true it will raise further questions about Mr Chernoi.

Therefore the short time ‑ limit itself does not raise an issue under Article 6 § 1 (compare Homann v.

Serious problems emerged in the family in May 1999 when P ran away from home. He alleged that his stepfather, the father of A. and B., had repeatedly beaten him.