CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216653
3 mars 2022
In reaching this conclusion the court noted the lack of direct evidence, inconclusive nature of witness testimonies and the delay the applicant took to come forward with her complaint notwithstanding the
ECLI:CEDH:001-238819
28 novembre 2024
The applicant appealed against the judgment of 6 May 2022, reiterating her complaints about the insufficiency of the evidence necessary for reaching conclusions about the mismanagement.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9758
25 février 1992
was disproportionate to legitimate aims pursued and thus not "necessary in a democratic society": depriving applicants of almost every means of contact for one and a half years was particularly far-reaching
ECLI:CEDH:001-249478
5 mars 2026
In reaching this conclusion, the court relied on witness statements, an expert report, and other evidence.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC002668195
22 mars 2001
PROCEDURE Following informal contacts between the applicants and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.
ECLI:CEDH:002-36
13 décembre 2011
on procedure sent to the applicant following the communication of his complaint had specified that in accordance with Rule 62 §   2 of the Rules of Court negotiations conducted with a view to reaching
ECLI:CEDH:001-234815
5 juin 2024
In 2012, when reaching the age of 55, the applicant began receiving a state old-age pension under an early-retirement scheme.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7180
12 octobre 2000
.) - 33670/96 Decision 12.10.2000 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-1-d Minors Minor suffering from mental disorder kept in secure accommodation until reaching age of majority: inadmissible In March 1995
ECLI:CEDH:001-113196
31 août 2012
years old (five years); reduced it by one sixth under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code taking into account the accused’s “sincere confession”, attitude and behaviour during the proceedings (thus reaching
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0717JUD001576603
17 juillet 2008
After reaching the age of fifteen, he left school in August 2006.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1112DEC001113184
12 novembre 1986
#xa0;      the Commission's decision of 6 October 1986 to cancel the hearing in the light of the parties' information that they were engaged in negotiations with a view to reaching
2ème Chambre civile
6438f237a942a604f5e933af
13 avril 2023
Madame [F] [T] [Y] [O] [N] épouse [G] née le [Date naissance 1] 1960 à [Localité 7] ([Localité 7]) [Adresse 5] [Localité 4] représentée et assistée de Me Gaël BALAVOINE, substitué par Me REICHLING
6438f237a942a604f5e933b1
APPELANTE : Madame [K] [O] [T] [B] [S] épouse [E] née le [Date naissance 1] 1960 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 6] [Localité 4] représentée et assistée de Me Gaël BALAVOINE, substitué par Me REICHLING
6438f237a942a604f5e933b7
APPELANTE : Madame [R] [J] [X] [C] [M] épouse [G] née le [Date naissance 1] 1960 à [Localité 8] [Adresse 6] [Localité 4] représentée et assistée de Me Gaël BALAVOINE, substitué par Me REICHLING
660f94eba40f8b0008cb72e1
4 avril 2024
APPELANTE : Madame [M] [F] [P] [J] épouse [N] née le [Date naissance 3] 1955 à [Localité 5] [Adresse 6] [Localité 1] Représentée et assistée par Me Jérémie PAJEOT, substitué par Me Noëmie REICHLING
6a2264b5cdc6046d47395d15
4 juin 2026
[Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Monsieur [H] [G] né le 07 Septembre 1950 à [Localité 4] (ALGERIE) [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentés et assistés par Me Jérémie PAJEOT, substitué par Me Noëmie REICHLING
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003077996
PROCEDURE Following informal contacts between the applicant’s and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC005688810
6 septembre 2016
In a letter dated 11 September 2015 the Government stated that they were interested in reaching a friendly settlement of the case, and made a proposal in that regard.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167331
14 septembre 2016
(b)     May the Çorum Administrative Court be deemed to have submitted the case to the careful scrutiny required by Article 2 of the Convention in reaching its conclusion regarding the liability
ECLI:CEDH:001-187030
17 septembre 2018
The report should point out all the objective criteria it relies on in reaching its conclusions . APPENDIX   No. Application no.
Page 5 sur 173