The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, relying in addition on Article 13 of the Convention, that the compensation was too low. THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT 3.

Z was however allowed to share the same apartment with his former wife and sons. 16.

On the same day the applicant was declared wanted by the police.

or essentially the same set of facts.

The court further decided, for the same reason, not to issue international letters of request to the authorities of Colombia or Togo. 8.

In the beginning of 2015 the Council of Ministers settled several other similar cases still pending before the Supreme Administrative Court, concerning land in the same area and expropriated in the same

In addressing his claims directly to the association, instead of the company insured, the applicant was bound by those same terms. 13.

On that same day, the applicant’s lawyer sent a letter to the Court of Appeal in which he objected to the date set and requested the Court of Appeal to render judgment within six weeks.

He also headed a local branch of a political party bearing the same name.

The applicant was ordered to refrain from publishing the advertisement unless, inter alia , when comparing the prices between the newspapers it disclosed at the same time their different reporting styles

She also complained that, after she had shared information on her Facebook page describing what had happened in M.M.’s office, O.A. made a statement on an Internet news portal (qafqazinfo.az), where he too

The applicant argued that her elder child had been diagnosed with a severe form of autism after having been vaccinated with the same vaccine and that therefore she had asked that immunology tests be carried

The applicants and the remaining owners of the plot applied for a judicial review of the expropriation decision, arguing in particular that the compensation awarded to them was too low.

the applicant, he was arrested and handcuffed by the police officers between 6.55 a.m. on 21 March 2019 and remained at his home without official registration of his detention until 1.30 p.m. of the same

Vieillemarige, demande au tribunal : 1) d'annuler l'arrêté du 19 décembre 2022 de la préfète d'Indre-et-Loire l'obligeant à quitter le territoire français dans le délai de trente jours et fixant le Togo

According to Section 2 of the same Act, a document sent by post is considered to have arrived when it has been delivered to the recipient.

On 28/08/2020 the same court dismissed her interlocutory appeal.

The Supreme Court added that under its own case-law, recusal of a judge in one case does not automatically mean that this judge is disqualified in other cases involving the same party.

In addition, the first applicant’s founders sought to pursue the same religious beliefs and practices as the BOC. 3.

On 4 June 2014 the Higher Commercial Court of Ukraine returned the prosecutor’s appeal in cassation as submitted too late.