It was noted that the applicant did not have an “index” conviction including a sex offence, an index offence which included an unconvicted sex offence, a previous conviction for a sex offence nor any other

that those who commit such offences should be duly punished; and public clamour that a particular offender whose case is under consideration should be singled out for severe punishment...."

and the degree of infringement of the obligations imposed on the offender; the nature and the scope of the negative consequences of the offence; the personal characteristics and circumstances of the offender

an indictable offence has followed a non-indictable offence and to the case of "anyone who, having committed in the previous fifteen years at least three offences each involving a penalty of imprisonment

CODE CIVIL, EN SON TEXTE APPLICABLE A LA CAUSE ; ATTENDU QUE L'INTRODUCTION DE LA DEMANDE EN DIVORCE NE CONFERE PAS AUX EPOUX, ENCORE DANS LES LIENS DU MARIAGE, UNE IMMUNITE DESTITUANT DE LEURS EFFETS

and that there was no indication that he would not abscond, obstruct the investigation or commit another offence.

It considered that as a result of his personality disorder, the applicant had a propensity to commit serious offences which seriously harmed the victims both physically and mentally.

These related to the offence (its seriousness, the nature of the victim’s injuries, the use of a weapon, planning), the offender (his record, the risk of his reoffending, any past history of violence),

Having consulted a medical expert, the Regional Court found that the applicant, acting with full criminal responsibility, had a tendency to commit offences against the physical integrity and property of

(CHARLES), CONTRE UN ARRET DU 7 OCTOBRE 1965 DE LA COUR D'APPEL D'AGEN QUI, POUR OFFENSE AU PRESIDENT DE LA REPUBLIQUE ET COMPLICITE, LES A COMDAMNES, LE PREMIER A UNE AMENDE DE 300 FRANCS, LE SECOND A

the execution of his detention, the expert and the courts had not convincingly shown that there was a risk that he would again commit a serious violent offence if released.

the offence of which he was found guilty.

The offence is one which only a male person can commit. It may be committed by a male person of any age, and he is liable on conviction to life imprisonment.

for the same offence.

At the time the applicant committed the offences the combined effect of section 25(1) of the Prison Act 1952, rule 5 of the Prison Rules 1964 and section 60 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 meant that

English law imposes a mandatory sentence for the offence of murder: "detention during Her Majesty’s pleasure" if the offender is under the age of 18 (section 53 (1) of the Children and Young Persons Act

To hold otherwise would have the bizarre result of rendering it advantageous for a prisoner held under a sentence of mandatory life imprisonment to commit a subsequent offence attracting a discretionary

On 11 December 2006 the Tax Rectification Committee rejected the applicant’s applications in respect of the tax years 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002.

confinement not decisive in view of the offenders’ persisting mental disorders: no violation Facts – After committing, respectively, the offences of theft and attempted aggravated burglary, the applicants

The case was submitted to the Trebišov District Office with a view to establishing whether the actions complained of constituted minor offences falling under the Minor Offences Act.