CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

10 412 résultats pour « Bedhale »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

TCOM

Chambre 04

69f06ebecdc6046d47d036b7

Commerce

27 avril 2026

27 avril 2026

BEDEIL, Juges, assistés de Mme Anaïs DIRANT Greffier Audiencier. Prononcée à l'audience publique du 27 avril 2026 où siégeaient Mme FREZET-TIRET, Président, M. CARLE, M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2601

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2007

12 juin 2007

In 1999 the General Directorate of Foundations, acting on behalf of the Orphanage, took proceedings to have the applicant’s ownership title annulled and the property reregistered under the Orphanage’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178834

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2017

25 octobre 2017

Were the principle of equality of arms and the requirement of adversarial procedure violated, inter alia , on account of the refusal to hear specialist Sh. on behalf of the defence (see Matytsina v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC005667719

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

; Petr Fradkov, informed the Registry that it wanted to withdraw the application to the Court and that the powers of Mr   Dmitry Ananyev, who had signed the application on the applicant bank’s behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225870

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2023

15 juin 2023

In April 2012 and May 2014 respectively a prosecutor, acting on behalf of the Odesa City Council, initiated two sets of proceedings challenging first the court judgment of 12 July 2011, and then the contracts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007DEC001948210

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2014

7 octobre 2014

No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249954

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

The applicant, a Moldovan national, purchased a vehicle in Germany on behalf of a private company under a general power of attorney and was transporting it to Moldova through the territory of Ukraine.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219253

Admin. suprême

22 août 2022

22 août 2022

  7144/15, §§   2 and 3, 20 June 2019) and does the mother have standing to act on behalf of her daughter (see Raw and Others v. France , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-220231

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2022

30 septembre 2022

Nonetheless, on 12   October 2016 the applicant’s attorney lodged the claim for damages on the applicant’s behalf, in order to prevent the claim from becoming time barred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6952

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2000

25 mai 2000

The law entitles such a person to seek a review on behalf of a deceased victim, and thus not only acknowledges the State’s responsibility but also the right to obtain a retrospective acquittal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126519

Admin. suprême

26 août 2013

26 août 2013

On 23 September 2008 the Diyarbakır Assize Court found the applicant guilty of the offence of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation, the PKK, under Article   7   §

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217997

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2022

24 mai 2022

The application is lodged with the Court by the applicant community’s chairperson on behalf of the community. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol   No.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242626

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2025

7 mars 2025

    Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article   6 § 3   (d) of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-667336-674210

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2002

10 décembre 2002

TURKEY   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing a judgment [1] in the case of Dicle on behalf of the DEP (DEMOCRATIC PARTY) v. Turkey (application no. 25141/94).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12710

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

Law – Article 14: (a)   Admissibility (exhaustion of domestic remedies) – The applicants explained that they had preferred to ask the association to act on their behalf for fear of retaliation by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0228DEC002675016

Admin. suprême

28 février 2023

28 février 2023

    The case concerns the domestic courts’ refusal to appoint to the applicant a legal aid lawyer who could lodge a   cassation appeal with the Supreme Court on her behalf. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-166730

Admin. suprême

23 août 2016

23 août 2016

On 12 January 2009 the Bakhchysaray district prosecutor appealed against the judgment of 9 June 2006 on the Department’s behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13213

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

The first application was lodged by a parent on his own behalf, complaining about the fact that he had been fined for failing to have his school-age children duly vaccinated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157440

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention that his right to a fair trial was violated on account of the domestic courts’ failure to hear witnesses on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0828DEC004148404

Admin. suprême

28 août 2007

28 août 2007

On 20 March 2000 the Regional Court decided to stay the proceedings pending the determination of the applicants’ request for an extra-ordinary appeal on points of law to be filed on their behalf.

Source officielle

Page 50 sur 521

← PrécédentSuivant →