CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD004314910
13 février 2018
Slovakia , no. 31827/02, §§ 64 and 67, ECHR 2011; and Costel Gaciu v. Romania , no. 39633/10, § 59, 23 June 2015). 48.
Page 50 sur 53
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD004037411
17 janvier 2017
1984 Romanian Clejani ROMANO CRISS Nicuşor BOACĂ 1988 Romanian Clejani ROMANO CRISS Tănţica BOACĂ 1986 Romanian Bucharest ROMANO CRISS Costel
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126926
10 septembre 2013
It was inherent in this constellation that contacts could only be established gradually and could also fail.
Tribunal Administratif de la Guadeloupe
ORTA_2301347_20231120
20 novembre 2023
14 novembre 2023, le groupement d'entreprises formé de la société Trav'Eaux, de la société Ingéni'Eaux Caraïbes et de la société d'aménagement en béton bitumineux (SABB), représentée par Me Nicole Cotellon
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0708REP001531889
8 juillet 1993
Court H.R., Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, para. 36). 70.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0122DEC002419694
22 janvier 1996
Director of the Central Mental Hospital, judgment of Costello J, 16 February 1995, [1995] 2 ILRM 354 and Croke v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0314DEC003104796
14 mars 2000
the case, such as the nature and context of the treatment, its duration, its physical and mental effects and, in some instances, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, for example, the Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD003433404
15 juin 2010
physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Ireland v. the United Kingdom , 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no. 25; Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0517DEC000859608
17 mai 2011
This was described by Costello J. in Pok Sun Shun v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD001085113
bring it within the ambit of Article 3 may nonetheless breach the private-life aspect of Article 8, if the effects on the applicant’s physical and moral integrity are sufficiently adverse (see Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0424JUD005769310
24 avril 2012
are to maintain and apply in practice an adequate legal framework affording protection against acts of violence by private individuals (see X and Y v. the Netherlands , cited above, §§ 22 and 23; Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105JUD001831006
5 novembre 2013
Accordingly, the severity of the adverse effects on his reputation were not sufficiently serious to give rise to an interference with his private life (see Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom , 25 &
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD007228601
28 mars 2006
Drug-resistant TB, which is significantly more difficult and costly to treat, is also increasing rapidly.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000744612
24 juillet 2014
91; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom , 25 March 1993, § 36, Series A no. 247-C; D.P. and J.C. v. the United Kingdom , no. 38719/97, § 118, 10 October 2002; M.C. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD001344404
30 avril 2009
On several occasions the Court has admitted that private life covers the physical integrity of the person (see, among other authorities, Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom , 25 March 1993, § 36, Series
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC005788400
19 mai 2005
received no compensation for the loss of their personal belongings or the emotional distress caused by the destruction of their homes reached the threshold of both Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention (see Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1008REP001422988
8 octobre 1991
On 6 October 1990 the Commission decided to invite the parties to an oral hearing on admissibility and merits on the same day as a hearing in a similar application, No. 13134/87, Wendy and Jeremy Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC005902100
12 décembre 2002
obligation under Article 1 according to which “the High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this Convention” (see Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD000971803
26 juillet 2011
of the physical and moral integrity of an individual by other persons when the authorities knew or ought to have known of those breaches (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, cited above, §§ 22 and 23; Costello-Roberts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331JUD002973606
31 mars 2015