Article 8 of the Convention, insofar as relevant, reads: “1.     Everyone has the right to respect for his ... correspondence. 2.

Article 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

application (no. 41820/16) against Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Serbian national, Mr Rešad

Rezard, rapporteur, - les conclusions de Mme Pestka, rapporteure publique, - les observations de Me Desmarais, représentant l'APICEM, - et les observations de Me Bekkali, pour l'ANS.

Rezard, rapporteur, - les conclusions de Mme Pestka, rapporteure publique, - les observations de Me Eyraud, représentant Mme F et autres. Considérant ce qui suit : 1. M.

Law – Article 10 read in light of Article 11: (a) Applicability – Both Articles 10 and 11 were applicable.

    According to the applicant, on 28 August 2013 he read in the newspapers a press statement by the government informing the public that during their 4 p.m. meeting of 27 August 2013 they had

  A/70/286, 5 August 2015), read as follows: “... 22.

Law – Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8, read in the light of Article 9: The domestic decisions had limited the applicant’s relationship with his daughter, constituting thus an interference with

The applicant complained that the decision of the High Court to consider his appeal by way of review and not by way of re-hearing was in violation of Article 6 read in conjunction with Article 14 of the

Its relevant part, as translated from Russian, read as follows: “We, Starshova Yevgeniya Vasilyevna and Starshov Aleksey Sergeyevich,... inform the European Court of Human Rights about our decision to

COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article 6 of the Convention, read alone and in conjunction with Article 14 that the transfer of their case to an assignee court amounts to the discriminative removal

    Relevant domestic law The relevant parts of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, as in force at the material time, read as follows: Article 281¹ § 1 “No [ordinary] appeal shall lie against

The applicants further complain under Article 9 read in conjunction with Article 11 of the Convention that the interruption and termination of their religious service by the police constituted an interference

They held that the first two of the impugned statements, when read in the context of the entire publication, as well as in the context of the ongoing investigation and the public conflict between the applicant

During the trial statements of victims Mr Kh.Z. and Mr S.P. as well as statements of the key witnesses against the applicants, Ms I.K. and Ms A.B., were read out in spite of the applicants’ direct objections

However, in the absence of any reference or visible link to the applicant’s earlier posts, it was not immediately understandable to readers that the impugned post was in fact part of a series concerning

The second applicant’s status as a former branch manager of the bank had conferred credibility on his statements in the eyes of the reader.

The respective medical report available in the file reads that at the material time the applicant had multiple bruises and hematomas, including on his face and all over his body. 6.

THE LAW On 13 September 2002 the Court received from the Polish Government a declaration that read, in so far as relevant: “I declare that, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned