T.’s witness statement was then read to the jury.

THE LAW     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   14 READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE   8 OF THE CONVENTION 22.

In its relevant parts, the recommendation reads as follows: “The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI): ...

The applicant complained that correspondence to and from his solicitor and the Commission was opened and read by the prison authorities in breach of Article 8 (art. 8) which reads: "1.

The relevant part of that decision reads: “...

    Relevant extracts from the Constitution of Ukraine read as follows: Article 32 “...

The Regional Court read out statements by the remaining six prosecution witnesses and by Mr A.

The relevant part of the second applicant’s statement reads as follows: “...

The subheadings announcing the article read: “the unbelievable story of a society photographer who made a fortune by ‘seducing’ Liliane Bettencourt, the richest woman in France” and “the accusations of

These Articles read as follows: Article 3 “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

    The Constitution The relevant Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia ( Ustav Republike Hrvatske , Official Gazette no. 56/90 with subsequent amendments) read: Article 48

    The relevant part of the Constitutional Court Act ( Ustavni zakon o Ustavnom sudu Republike Hrvatske , Official Gazette no. 49/2002 of 3 May 2002) reads as follows: Section 23 “Each party

  Article 2 of the Law of the Lithuanian Republic on Responsibility for the Genocide of Lithuanian Inhabitants (enacted on 9 April 1992) reads as follows: “The killing and torturing and deportation

    The relevant parts of Law no. 275/2006, in force at the material time, read as follows: Section 45 “2.

The relevant part of the decision reads: “... the finding of the first-instance court that the ground for further detention of the accused under Article 102 paragraph 1(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

The prosecutor then requested that all applicant’s pre-trial testimonies, including his initial confession, be read out to the jury.

  That decision was based on Article 209 read together with Article 217 § 1 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

It is the applicant’s belief that her personal letters were read by the officers investigating her case.

Article 7 of the Convention reads as follows: “1.

He invokes Article 3 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 6 para. 1.   2.