AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1°/ Mademoiselle Françoise Z..., demeurant rue de la Boise à Diou

HYPOTHECAIRES NEGOCIES PAR X..., NOTAIRE, PLUSIEURS IMMEUBLES LUI APPARTENANT ONT ETE SAISIS ET VENDUS SUR ADJUDICATION, LE 12 MARS 1954, POUR LA SOMME DE 1 300 000 ANCIENS FRANCS, A DAME Z..., BELLE-MERE

This case was assigned to the newly composed Second Section (Rule 52 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 9.

In the case of Kulikowski v.

Jean-Pierre Uguet, demeurant Les Mognonettes, 38250 La Frette, défendeurs à la cassation ; Donne acte à M.

N° RG 25/00734 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7J-GW2Y Minute : GMC JCP Copie exécutoire à : Maître Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY - RENDA - KARM, avocats au barreau de CHARTRES,

N° RG 25/00737 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7J-GW26 Minute : GMC JCP Copie exécutoire à : Maître Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY - RENDA - KARM, avocats au barreau de CHARTRES,

Thus, in the case of Markovic and Others v.

The present case 14 .

The Court recalls however that the scope of the Court’s jurisdiction is determined by the Convention itself, in particular by Article 32, and not by the parties’ submissions in a particular case, the mere

The applicants had objected to the use of the number in their case solely because they believed that its mere existence harmed their spiritual well-being.

of the risk in his particular case.

Nothing in the case file indicated that she had in any way failed to fulfil her duties as a security officer because of her sex.

The Court of Cassation dismissed an appeal on points of law lodged by the applicant.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

Article 6 § 1 – The mere possibility to reopen a criminal case was prima facie compatible with the Convention, including the guarantees of Article 6.

Moreover, it had not been examined at all whether in the circumstances of the case the examination of the applicant’s paternity would harm the child’s interests or not.

    Did the Supreme Court provide sufficient reasons for the alleged departure from its case-law (see Atanasovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , no.