Szpunar, presentadas el 3 de febrero de 2015.#Kernkraftwerke Lippe-Ems GmbH contra Hauptzollamt Osnabrück.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Finanzgericht Hamburg.

Sharpston, presentate il 12 febbraio 2015.#Z. Zh. contro Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie e Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie contro I. O.

Ordinanza della Corte (Ottava Sezione) del 12 febbraio 2015.#Procedimento penale a carico di Procura della Repubblica di Cagliari.

Ordinanza della Corte (Ottava Sezione) del 4 febbraio 2016.#Emsibeth SpA contro Ufficio per l'armonizzazione nel mercato interno (marchi, disegni e modelli) (UAMI).

Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Novena) de 29 de febrero de 2024.#Investcapital Ltd contra G. H. R.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Juzgado de Primera Instancia de León.

Conclusiones del Abogado General Kokott presentadas el 12 de febrero de 2004.#Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund, Gewerkschaft der Privatangestellten contra Wirtschaftskammer Österreich.

Sentenza del Tribunale (Quinta Sezione) del 3 febbraio 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko contro Consiglio dell'Unione europea.

On 11 February 1994 the Kalisz Regional Court requested the applicant to specify his claim. On 11 February 1994 the applicant complied with the court’s order.

La parole ayant été donnée, avant et après les conclusions, à la SCP Le Griel, avocat de la société Ferrari Et Cie. 1.

hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Cooperativa Parco Cuma case delivered on 27 February

  2016 and in custody, in particular between 28   February and 2   March   2016; and on 22   June 2016; the lack of effective investigation of the relevant complaints; and the

Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Santilli delivered on 19 February

The applicant’s housing allocation order dated 7 February 1999 appeared suspicious to the authorities and they commissioned an expert to verify its authenticity.

Russia (no. 27256/03), judgment of 26 February 2009. Bantayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 20727/04), judgment of 12 February 2009. Batsanina v. Russia (no. 3932/02), judgment of 26 May 2009.

2020, Moscow City Court, RUB   100,000 3) 26   February 2020, Moscow City Court, RUB   100,000 4) 26   February 2020, Moscow City Court, RUB   100,000 5) 28   February 2020

Ferrari Bravo, Mr R. Türmen, Mr B. Zupančič and Mr T. Panţîru. 4.

However, the writ of execution concerning the above judgment of 11 February 2015 had not yet been submitted.

    On 26 December 1980 and 29 January, 13 February and 31 April 1981 the applicant was questioned by the police officers.