of his own and his wife’s health problems.

The applicant submitted that the order that he remove the item secreted in his anus constituted an interference with his rights under Article 8.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique pris en sa première branche : Vu l'article 1173 du nouveau Code de procédure

poor health to exposure to radiation during his participation in emergency operations at the Chernobyl nuclear plant.

to act as his trustee as regards such matters until further notice.

The applicant argued that he had renounced his part of the inheritance for the benefit of his sister who had paid all the expenses of their mother’s funeral.

    On various dates the applicant applied for his release from detention on remand.

Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

his parental rights. 4.

    The applicant submitted, first of all, that his placement in a metal cage during the trial had prevented his free and confidential communication with his lawyer because the escort officers

In his petition, the applicant’s lawyer also requested that a copy of the audiotapes be provided to him and his client. 26.

  159   F 13061/89, he complained in his two-page submissions that the suspension of access to his child violated his parental rights and was contrary to the child’s well-being.

    The applicant states that he brings the application in his own name and in the name of his deceased wife and child.

He relied on Article 8 of the Convention, submitting that the search and seizure at his office had violated his right to respect for his private life and that of his clients in that the seized items had

He died on 31 May 2014, and on   4   September 2014 his mother, who is his only heir, expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf. 3 .

family and his own social rehabilitation."

his arrest.

The applicant expressed his indignation in his commentary on the video. Mr S. sued the applicant for defamation.

and cause of his injuries.

Jehl, - et les observations de Me Moller, substituant Me Hiesse, représentant M. D et Mme C, ces derniers assistés de Mme E, interprète en langue géorgienne.