CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

28 196 résultats pour « Rezad »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194742

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2019

24 juin 2019

In particular, were the finding that his detention had been unlawful and the amount received as compensation sufficient for the purpose of Article 5 read in conjunction with Article 34 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14232

Admin. suprême

29 août 2023

29 août 2023

Communicated under Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233356

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

    Has the applicant suffered gender-based discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 3 (see, for example , Opuz v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512DEC002900307

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

In particular, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the agreement read as follows: “4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0704DEC002086202

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2002

4 juillet 2002

law Section 59 (4) of the Constitutional Act on the Constitutional Court (entered into force on 24 September 1999 - hereinafter “the 1999 Constitutional Court Act” - Ustavni zakon o Ustavnom sudu ) reads

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC003936098

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2000

5 septembre 2000

Article 5 §§ 3 and 5 reads, in so far as relevant, read as follows: “3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124DEC001481002

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2005

24 novembre 2005

The regional court read out operative provisions of its decision at the hearing. A copy of the reasoned decision was later served on the applicant. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC000040605

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

On 14 January 2005 the applicant lodged a claim for damages under section 16   of the 2004   Act read in conjunction with Article 417 of the Civil Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114360

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2012

10 octobre 2012

In the view of the Constitutional Court, the average readers would not understand the depictions in the book as true facts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC006059609

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2012

11 décembre 2012

    Article 423 § 1 (g) of the Code on Civil Procedure reads as follows: “A final and enforceable judgment can be reviewed on the basis of newly discovered circumstances, if ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD002075804

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2016

11 octobre 2016

This Article reads: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” A.     Admissibility 1.     The Government 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211DEC004347206

Admin. suprême

11 février 2020

11 février 2020

    The relevant Sections of the Law read as follows: Section 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156302

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2015

24 juin 2015

The pre-trial statements of these witnesses were read out in open court and admitted as evidence. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157736

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2015

7 septembre 2015

This conclusion, insofar as relevant to the present case, read as follows:   “1.     [the applicant] has ..: a skin scar in place of a former skin wound on the head.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119DEC002993304

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2016

19 janvier 2016

Article 8 of the Convention reads as follows: “1.     Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC005252999

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2002

30 avril 2002

The relevant parts of Article 6 § 3 read as follows: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC000096805

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

    Following the 2009 Amendment, section 1 of the 2004 Act, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0212DEC006232113

Admin. suprême

12 février 2019

12 février 2019

    The text of the apology to be published by the head of the Gdynia police headquarters on the police website read as follows: “The head of the Gdynia police headquarters declares that the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630DEC000314517

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2020

30 juin 2020

The relevant parts of the judgment read as follows: “[Law no. 16/2001 of 22 June 2001] seeks to clarify that the activity of the ministry of faith is considered professional, if it provides a means of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC005545900

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2005

24 mai 2005

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

Source officielle

Page 55 sur 1410

← PrécédentSuivant →