CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0626JUD004007803
26 juin 2008
This judgment became binding on 7   August 2002, but was not enforced immediately. 7.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-88092
25 juin 2008
execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56357
22 avril 2004
),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Müller case delivered on 5   November   2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56286
20 octobre 2003
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jerusalem case delivered on 27 February 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-68033
22 décembre 2004
the four cases details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered on 7 November 2002, 5 June, 24 June and 10 July 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56379
20 juillet 2004
Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Graužinis against Lithuania delivered on 10 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-69927
18 juillet 2005
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Veeber No. 2 case delivered on 21 January 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC003584414
15 novembre 2016
The judgment became final on 6   January 2014. An execution writ was issued with the judgment of 13   December 2013.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10148
9 octobre 2014
However, by the time the court orders became final, the companies had become insolvent.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC003195618
18 mai 2021
The Court notes that the Constitutional Court’s decision in question was delivered in 2018 – a year before a constitutional complaint became an effective domestic remedy for such complaints (see Kušić,
ECLI:CEDH:001-69924
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Puhk case delivered on 10   February 2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:002-4124
10 novembre 2004
In the absence of an appeal, the decision became final. The applicant was arrested in Germany more than two years later. The Italian courts requested his extradition.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210DEC005285012
10 décembre 2019
that court with powers that enabled it to provide, in principle, direct and speedy redress for violations of the rights and freedoms protected by the Convention, in respect of all decisions that had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-113990
26 septembre 2012
Government of the Netherlands (‘the Government’) to pay the applicant €1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable, within three months of the date on which the judgment becomes
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516DEC001684912
16 mai 2017
In this regard, the Government submitted several judgments of the Court of Cassation where this court emphasized that there was no need to wait for the proceedings to become final in order to decide on
ECLI:CEDH:001-56356
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Veeber I case delivered on 7   November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:002-12074
10 avril 2018
compensation had to be examined within a reasonable time; (ii)   the compensation had to be paid promptly and generally no later than six months from the date on which the decision awarding compensation became
ECLI:CEDH:001-80780
20 avril 2007
judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56171
24 février 2003
Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Biba case delivered on 26 September 2000 transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0606JUD001706015
6 juin 2023
satisfaction • Art 37 § 1 • Striking out applications • Absence of intention to pursue application   STRASBOURG 6 June 2023     FINAL   06/09/2023     This judgment has become
Page 56 sur 1474
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.