CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0626JUD004007803

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2008

26 juin 2008

This judgment became binding on 7   August 2002, but was not enforced immediately. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-88092

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2008

25 juin 2008

execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56357

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2004

22 avril 2004

),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Müller case delivered on 5   November   2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56286

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2003

20 octobre 2003

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jerusalem case delivered on 27 February 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68033

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2004

22 décembre 2004

the four cases details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered on 7 November 2002, 5 June, 24 June and 10 July 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56379

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Graužinis against Lithuania delivered on 10 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69927

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2005

18 juillet 2005

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Veeber No. 2 case delivered on 21 January 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC003584414

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2016

15 novembre 2016

The judgment became final on 6   January 2014. An execution writ was issued with the judgment of 13   December 2013.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10148

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2014

9 octobre 2014

However, by the time the court orders became final, the companies had become insolvent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC003195618

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2021

18 mai 2021

The Court notes that the Constitutional Court’s decision in question was delivered in 2018 – a year before a constitutional complaint became an effective domestic remedy for such complaints (see Kušić,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-69924

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2005

18 juillet 2005

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Puhk case delivered on 10   February 2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4124

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2004

10 novembre 2004

In the absence of an appeal, the decision became final. The applicant was arrested in Germany more than two years later. The Italian courts requested his extradition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210DEC005285012

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2019

10 décembre 2019

that court with powers that enabled it to provide, in principle, direct and speedy redress for violations of the rights and freedoms protected by the Convention, in respect of all decisions that had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113990

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2012

26 septembre 2012

Government of the Netherlands (‘the Government’) to pay the applicant €1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable, within three months of the date on which the judgment becomes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516DEC001684912

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

In this regard, the Government submitted several judgments of the Court of Cassation where this court emphasized that there was no need to wait for the proceedings to become final in order to decide on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56356

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2004

22 avril 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Veeber I case delivered on 7   November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12074

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

compensation had to be examined within a reasonable time; (ii)   the compensation had to be paid promptly and generally no later than six months from the date on which the decision awarding compensation became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-80780

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2007

20 avril 2007

judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56171

Admin. suprême

24 février 2003

24 février 2003

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Biba case delivered on 26 September 2000 transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0606JUD001706015

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2023

6 juin 2023

satisfaction • Art 37 § 1 • Striking out applications • Absence of intention to pursue application   STRASBOURG 6 June 2023     FINAL   06/09/2023     This judgment has become

Source officielle

Page 56 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.