CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CO10414
22 juin 2022
FB COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 22 juin 2022 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DARBOIS, conseiller doyen faisant fonction de président
Page 56 sur 849
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CO10417
DB COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 22 juin 2022 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DARBOIS, conseiller doyen faisant fonction de président
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12669
5 décembre 2019
Article 41 : EUR 12,000 each in respect of non-pecuniary damage; claims for pecuniary damage dismissed. (See also Otto-Preminger-Institut v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD001327408
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general};Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0402JUD003461502
2 avril 2009
On an unspecified date the applicant sued the ARKO and the Central Bank of Russia for damages.
Trib. de Commerce
69e43d77cdc6046d47bfb071
16 avril 2026
. […] ATTENDU que Madame [H] [E] a été convoquée en Chambre du Conseil le 09/04/2026 à 9hrs ; ATTENDU que Madame [H] [E] a comparu assistée de Maître DARBIER VOISIN Catherine Avocat au Barreau de MARSEILLE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD003035203
6 novembre 2008
Damage 43.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD002607303
13 novembre 2008
By Article 253 of the Civil Code, in the version in force until 31 July 2002 and applicable to damage caused up to that date, compensation for non-pecuniary damage can be awarded only if it is provided
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401JUD003727803
1 avril 2008
Violation of Art. 6-1;Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
ECLI:CEDH:002-1300
20 octobre 2009
Article 41: Awards ranging from EUR 5,000 to EUR 40,000 to the owners of the newspapers in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD004166507
Violation of Art. 10;Remainder inadmissible;Pecuniary damage - award;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CEDH:002-1659
24 février 2009
the MP’s statements were damaging for their reputation, the applicants brought proceedings in the civil court against the MP, the editorial director of the newspaper and its publishing house, seeking damages
ECLI:CEDH:002-1437
2 juillet 2009
Violation of P1-1;Remainder inadmissible;Non-pecuniary damage - reserved;Pecuniary damage - reserved
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD003653304
14 octobre 2008
Violation of Art. 6-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD003740603
He also claimed EUR 1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 43. The Government accepted the claim in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0523JUD003044796
23 mai 2002
Violation of P1-1;Pecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0523JUD003196496
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702JUD003404996
2 juillet 2002
Pecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0130JUD002654695
30 janvier 2003
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524JUD004521499
24 mai 2005
Damage 54. The applicant sought compensation for pecuniary damage which he incurred in connection with the case in the amount of PLN 52,000.