On 26 May 2008 the applicant and an accomplice were indicted for joint robbery and dangerous bodily injury.

    The defendants’ flats were searched and multiple copies of Hizb   ut ‑ Tahrir’s literature and leaflets were found there.

    On 5 January 2011 these complaints were communicated to the Government.

and businessmen who were allegedly obstructing its business.

The police were immediately called to the scene but failed to apprehend the attackers. A preliminary investigation was then opened and, on an unspecified date, two suspects were arrested.

The applicant's allegations of the lack of organised help from the prison authorities were not contested by the Romanian Government.

Two medical reports were drawn up   confirming that the applicant was mentally ill and needed medical treatment in a specialised psychiatric hospital.

  In the second case the applicants, Isabelle Brosset ‑ Triboulet, who was born in 1935 and Eliane   Brosset ‑ Pospisil [1] , who was born in 1938, are two French nationals who

Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 24   March 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Rait Maruste, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Renate Jaeger,   Isabelle

  In 1998 criminal proceedings were brought against the applicant for tax evasion, forgery and uttering forgeries.

The charges of discrimination were repeatedly dismissed, however, on the grounds that the existence of discrimination could only be established in the framework of criminal proceedings.

European Convention on Human Rights     Principal facts   The applicants are three Italian nationals: Stefano Guiso-Gallisay, Gian Francesco Guiso-Gallisay and Antonella Guiso-Gallisay who were

The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska.

  The Court of Cassation dismissed Mr Si Amer’s appeal on points of law, stating that there were no arguable grounds of appeal.

European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6   December 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Danutė Jočienė,   Dragoljub Popović,   Isabelle

They were all represented before the Court by Mr T. Mariz, a lawyer practising in Coimbra (Portugal). A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

His claims were dismissed almost in their entirety by the Paris tribunal de grande instance (2   July 1997) and subsequently the Paris Court of Appeal (6   March 1998), in particular on the ground

It considered that the funding and management of a place of worship, of any type, were matters of public interest for the members of the religious community concerned and, more broadly, the community as

Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 23 septembre et 26 octobre 2022, la SARL Ikone, représentée par Me Céline Wester, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'une somme de 3 500 euros soit mise