CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

19 549 résultats pour « Leneel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD000996021

Admin. suprême

8 février 2024

8 février 2024

The Court finds that the redress provided to the applicant at the domestic level, considered on the basis of the facts of which he complains before the Court, was insufficient (see   Janulis v.

Source officielle

Page 56 sur 978

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD005894211

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2020

26 mars 2020

per application (in euros) [2]     58942/11 03/08/2011 Aleksandar RASPOPOVIĆ 11/12/1949 Lompar Svetlana Podgorica 03/03/2004   09/06/2011   7 years, 3 months and 6 days   3 levels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006JUD006226619

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD003791021

Admin. suprême

8 février 2024

8 février 2024

The Court finds that the redress provided to the applicant at the domestic level, considered on the basis of the facts of which he complains before the Court, was insufficient (see   Janulis v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0926DEC005487819

Admin. suprême

26 septembre 2023

26 septembre 2023

It normally also requires that any complaint intended to be lodged subsequently at the international level should have been aired before those same courts, at least in substance and in compliance with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD000339117

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2021

22 juillet 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD002363520

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2021

8 juillet 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD001728209

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2016

6 octobre 2016

per applicant (in euros) [1]     17282/09 19/03/2009 Pavel BARTOK 19/11/1955 Werner Krempels Freiburg 19/03/1999   16/09/2008   9 years and 6 months   2 levels of jurisdiction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0624JUD002508320

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2021

24 juin 2021

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11221

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

of severity, as was the case with metal cages, that level might be attained if the circumstances of their confinement, taken as a whole, would cause them distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD001683107

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

He also regularly received packs of glucometer strips for the purpose of measuring blood sugar levels. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0512JUD003314421

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2026

12 mai 2026

    The applicants complain under Articles   11 and 13 of the Convention of the protracted nature of arbitration proceedings held to set the minimum level of services to be provided during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224224

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2023

22 mars 2023

January 2023 communicated on 22 March 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the length of civil proceedings in an employment dispute which lasted slightly over six years at three levels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1252

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2009

5 novembre 2009

xa0; 330‑ ФЗ of 4   December 2007: not effective remedy; inadmissible   Facts – The applicant lodged an application with the European Court more than six months after a decision at cassation level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2050

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2008

10 juin 2008

As to the level of compensation, unlike the stance taken by the domestic courts in the instant case, the reasoning of the courts in such matters should be based on the strong but rebuttable presumption

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5287

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2002

9 juillet 2002

(ii)   As to the amount of compensation for injury to health resulting from the compulsory inoculation, even assuming that the level of compensation was relevant when examining whether the interference

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4960

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2003

3 avril 2003

The duration of the proceedings, more than thirteen years and nine months for two levels of jurisdiction, is excessive. Conclusion : violation (unanimous).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-80

Admin. suprême

16 février 2012

16 février 2012

for more than ten years, during which period the investigators had refused to institute criminal proceedings against the police officer six times; all these decisions had later been quashed by higher-level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7294

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

Turkey - 37569/06 Judgment 27.11.2012 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Appeal on points of law declared inadmissible on grounds that level of fine was below statutory

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0829DEC005260217

Admin. suprême

29 août 2019

29 août 2019

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 52602/17 14/07/2017 Mikhail Andreevich

Source officielle