THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The first applicant was born in 1967. The second applicant was born in 1979. Both applicants live in Belogorsk. 5.

and time of the appeal hearing confirmed, albeit indirectly, that his right to a fair hearing had not been infringed.

    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. Building permit for a BROADCAST RELAY station 5 .

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background to the dispute 5 .

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

An error of law or fact by the national court which is so evident as to be characterised as a “manifest error” – that is to say, an error that no reasonable court could ever have made – may be such as

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in Chișinău. 6 .

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

determined by the Court of Appeal when convicting and sentencing the applicant - and, in doing so, overturning the decision of the first-instance court by which he was acquitted - could not, as a matter of fair

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The facts of the cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1940 and lives in Kyiv. 6.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS 2.     The applicant company, Ukrkava, TOV, is a limited liability company registered in Ukraine. The applicant company was represented by Ms   M.O.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.