X..., célibataire, vit en France auprès de sa soeur et de son beau-frère, dont il n'est pas discuté qu'ils jouissent de la nationalité française, et si la mesure attaquée a été prise sept ans après le

However, it was also adjourned because the applicant was ill. 11.

On 18 January 2007 the Znojmo District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim seeking an official declaration that the Czech Republic was still the owner of the plot of land, because in the meantime the

(c) because his remand lacked justification on any other concrete ground; (iv)   that his remand on 29 July 2011 was unlawful and arbitrary (a)   because the courts have failed to appreciate

effective remedy in the domestic courts in respect of a complaint about the length of proceedings; (iv) Articles 5 and 10 of the Convention (art. 5, art. 10) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) (because

  A hearing scheduled for 7 May 1997 did not take place because the lawyers of the Naples Bar Association were on strike.

With decision of 3 March 2009 the FOM revoked the asylum granted to the applicant because he was sentenced for a crime (the killing of his wife).

On 27 June 2011 the police proposed the termination of the investigation because no elements of a crime had been identified.

    The second applicant The Government argued that the second applicant’s complaint was inadmissible because Article 6 had not applied to the proceedings in question, because the second applicant

  By the time of her release the applicant had to be catheterised because the lack of fluid intake and problems in getting to the toilet had caused her to retain urine.

The hearing listed for 27   January   1995 was cancelled because the judge rapporteur was ill.

In the course of the proceedings before the first-instance court five hearings were adjourned because the applicant was absent, two hearings were adjourned because of the absence of an expert and further

On 23 August 1996 the court held a hearing which had to be adjourned because of the absence of the defendant’s representative.

The Court notes that the proceedings against the applicant were discontinued on appeal because the action had become time-barred.

The applicant emphasises that he originally claimed benefits in March 1985, when he was refused solely because he was a man. 2.

    During the investigation B.K. said that he had not seen the person who had shot, because he had turned away from the scene.

On 21 November 1994 the same court decided that the case could not be heard because the applicant had not been summoned in accordance with the law.

   The applicant complains under Article 4 para. 2 of the Convention that he was forced to perform compulsory labour because he was not paid.

  In other words, Tasos Papadopoulos, because he is the one we call ‘Kirycas’, puts forward his name to head the DIKO’s ballot.