Had the applicant association’s request been granted, compliance with it would have required substantial resources to anonymise numerous decisions issued over a number of years and would thus have jeopardised

    In substance it found that the applicants had not sufficiently proved that they would not have access to medical treatment in Italy.

:39.05pt } .s896457AE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:8pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 7823/04 Alesandru

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

On 11 August 2010 he again started a hunger strike, asking to have an expert report commissioned and to be informed of the exact charges against him.

It is thus undeniably her home, and the Government have never claimed otherwise. 57.

However, they submitted that “had they done so, the procedure and outcome would have been entirely different”.

They had merely emphasised that the applicant could have travelled abroad using his passport and thus succeeded in evading his obligation. 46.

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 56869/00 by Aleksandra

    Taking into account that the applicant companies could ask for the restitution of assets before the judge of the execution ( incidente di esecuzione ), did they have an effective domestic

The Government did not refer to any circumstances which might have precluded them from raising the objection in a timely manner. 25.

Remand prison officers told him that he should have brought his own bedding. The cell was very cold and damp. Since he did not have any bedding he was obliged to sleep in his clothes.

The State agents should have been aware that the use of such ammunition could have resulted in the death or fatal injury of the people they had shot at.

The applicants could easily have avoided detention, had they complied with the lawful requirement not to take photographs. 47.

the Court found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, it considered that the applicants had suffered a real loss of opportunity and that, consequently, the violations found were likely to have

It further found that the applicant did not claim to have ever taken any steps to move his family to Austria. 11.

    The applicant further complained that there had been no effective procedure by which he could have challenged his detention.

However, where more than ten years have elapsed since the incident, the applicants have to justify the delay in lodging their application with the Court (see Varnava and Others , cited above, §§  

The Government, on the other hand, invites the Court to have regard to the rent that the applicants could have collected for the flats in question under Law no. 107/2006 as of 1 January 2007, thus, in