In the leading cases of Spahić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, nos. 20514/15 and 15 others, §§ 25-31, 14 November 2017, and Kunić and   Others v.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others (cited above) , the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Rutkowski and Others v.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, 10 March 2009, Akhlyustin v. Russia , no. 21200/05, 7 November 2017, Zubkov and Others , cited above, Dudchenko v.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others , cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of N.T. v. Russia , no. 14727/11, 2 June 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 18.

    In the leading case of Korban v. Ukraine , no. 26744/16, §§ 158-81, 4   July 2019, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v. Ukraine, no. 40107/02, 10   February 2011 and Ignatov v.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

In the Court’s view, leaving the secret surveillance operation to the sole discretion of law enforcement authorities, the domestic law failed to provide adequate safeguards against various possible abuses

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    In the leading case of Gazsó v. Hungary, no. 48322/12, 16 July 2015, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others, cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27   November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.