CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13743
11 juillet 2022
of Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 and of Article 18 taken together with Article 5 § 1, considering that the applicant’s pre-trial detention was not justified by any “reasonable suspicion”, but was based on the mere
Page 58 sur 440
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0903DEC000929314
3 septembre 2019
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0321DEC000461870
21 mars 1972
Z's participation in the case, the applicant refers to the grounds for challenging the judge which were submitted to the Federal Court.
ECLI:CEDH:002-520
31 mai 2011
That standard had not been met in the applicant’s case.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC004592299
23 février 1999
Relevant domestic law Under Section 29 of the Act on Compulsory Mental Care ( Lagen om psykiatrisk tvångsvård , 1991:1128), such care shall be terminated at the request of the competent police
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD006004113
19 janvier 2017
the case at issue. 56.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD000164102
7 juin 2007
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0626DEC002920421
26 juin 2025
Divergent case-law as source of legal uncertainty 12.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12667
3 décembre 2019
In this connection, there was no indication in the case file that the organisation in question, beyond the mere proclamation of certain goals, had adopted any concrete preparatory steps or indeed any form
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC000508111
9 octobre 2012
Referring to the Court’s case-law it held that Article 5 § 4 of the Convention applied only when the person was still detained.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1008DEC002632295
8 octobre 2002
after-care is going to be organised.
8ème / 3ème SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000028938261
27 juin 2007
secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentés pour le SYNDICAT INTERCOMMUNAL DES COMMUNES ALIMENTEES PAR LES CANAUX DE LA SIAGNE ET DU LOUP (SICASIL), dont le siège est 28, boulevard du Midi à Cannes
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630DEC004407814
30 juin 2020
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4. In 2008 the applicant married A.P.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204JUD003834223
4 décembre 2025
In their view, the crux of the case lay not in the hospital’s failure to provide medical care but in the fact that B.J. had died a few days after his voluntary departure from the hospital (the official
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2010:SO01388
30 juin 2010
; Attendu, selon les arrêts attaqués, que par lettres du 12 juillet 2006, la société Laboratoire Merk Sharp et Dhome Chibret a notifié à MM.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12059
19 juin 2018
Therefore, the main issue in this case was the applicant’s use of his right to freedom of expression as an academic.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC002792521
12 octobre 2023
It concluded that the Appeals Division, in convicting the applicant, had taken care to assess his guilt on the basis of the criteria defined by the Court’s case-law, having regard to the requirements of
ECLI:CEDH:002-4106
9 novembre 2004
(see Houfova , (dec.), 1 July 2003 and, a contrario , Malhous , 2001, Case-Law Report No. 32).
ECLI:CEDH:002-2343
6 décembre 2007
In this particular case the Court of Cassation had been at the origin of deep and lasting divergences.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11376
27 octobre 2016
margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law