that belonging to his neighbour.

In his new application, the second applicant stated that, due to his age and poor state of health, claiming that he suffered from a disability, it had taken him a long time to get to the places where he

The Civil Code According to Article 11, any natural person has the right to protection of his or her personality, in particular of his or her life and health, civil and human dignity, privacy, name and

O.K., Ö.Ö. and E.K. as result of ill-treatment and in the absence of a lawyer for his conviction before the domestic courts.

       The applicant further complains that the deliberate burning of his lorry constitutes a violation of his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions, as guaranteed

In his comment to the Court of Appeal X stated that the credits in question had come to his knowledge when the case became pending.

clothes or at his home.

his personal file held by his former employer.

his disability pension. 8.

    The applicant complained that the authorities had not taken any steps to safeguard his health and well-being by failing to provide him with adequate medical assistance for his spine condition

means and the reasons for his failure to pay the poll tax.

His appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 4 March 2003.

to return to his home and had lost all access to and use of his property.

as a result of his disease. 9.

  The applicant and his family are gypsies, who led a traditional travelling lifestyle.

    On 24 September 2012 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint asserting, inter alia , that the search of his home had been conducted without his knowledge and without a court order

   In his fresh submissions to the Cathedral Chapter dated 31 May 1991 the applicant maintained his claims.

However, he was given credit for his guilty plea in the form of a one-third reduction in his sentence.

The prosecutor had also failed to hear the applicant prior to his detention or to provide reasons for his detention and had failed to immediately bring him before a judge following his arrest.

    According to the applicant, he complied with Mr L.’s order, stepped out into a corridor, stood with his face to the wall and put his hands above his head on the wall as required by internal