In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28   March 2006 and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; for more recent case-law see Beketov v.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; for more recent case-law see Beketov v.

    In the leading cases of Kharchenko v.   Ukraine, no.   40107/02, 10   February 2011, and Ignatov v.   Ukraine, no.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004 the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

As for costs and expenses, the applicant requested the Court to make an award for the work conducted by his lawyers in the present case, leaving the amount to be determined by the Court. 18.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Idalov v.

    In the leading case of Nakhmanovich v. Russia (no. 55669/00, 2 March 2006) the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 12.

    In the leading case of R. Kačapor and Others v.

    In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006) and Sukachov v.

    In the leading case of Krasnoshapka v.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, nos.

    In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Ruslan Yakovenko v.

    In the leading case of Rutkowski and Others v. Poland, nos.

  The applicant was of the opinion that since the competent court had not duly notified the passport authority of the abolition of the travel ban, it still constituted a legal obstacle to his leaving

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.