CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0904DEC003090096

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 1996

4 septembre 1996

  The decision concerning the applicant's dismissal became final on 22 October 1990.

Source officielle

Page 6 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD001182811

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

A had paid the taxes and tax surcharges entirely before the charge became pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC001838607

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2016

17 mai 2016

  On 6 February 2008 this decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation and became final. COMPLAINT 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3446

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

was desirable in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings that the Government take appropriate measures to ensure that the applicant’s embryos were preserved until the Court’s judgment became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307JUD000633905

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

Arden LJ noted that neither the Warnock Report nor the Green Paper which had preceded the legislation had discussed what was to happen if the parties became estranged during treatment (see paragraphs 23

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2687680-2930862

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2009

26 mars 2009

He became eligible for parole on 5   July 1979 after 15 years in prison.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD001703913

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

In the present case, the first set of proceedings had not yet become final within the meaning of the Convention when the second set of proceedings became pending on 17 November 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD005375312

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

The court had held that the ne bis in idem prohibition applied as the tax surcharges had become final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-166874

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2016

1 septembre 2016

On 21 September 2010 the Ministry of Finance dismissed an appeal by the applicant against that decision, which thereby became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9285

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

six-month time-limit for lodging applications, arguing that time had started to run when the commercial court’s decision terminating the insolvency proceedings was published in the Official Gazette and/or became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210783

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2021

2 juin 2021

By a judgment which became final on 7 April 2011 the domestic courts dismissed her action as statute-barred because the three-year statutory limitation period had elapsed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-78109

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the K.S. case delivered on 31   May   2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56373

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2004

15 juin 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Český case delivered on 6   June 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248582

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2026

12 janvier 2026

On 30 October 2007 the above judgment became final and enforceable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-71162

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2005

26 octobre 2005

”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the B.B. case delivered on 10   February   2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56358

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2004

22 avril 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Włoch case delivered on 19   October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55915

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2000

18 décembre 2000

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the García Manibardo case delivered on 15 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55937

Admin. suprême

26 février 2001

26 février 2001

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Chierici B. and E. case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327DEC005041907

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2018

27 mars 2018

    This decision became final on 22 April 2009. COMPLAINTS 36.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0317DEC003177908

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2015

17 mars 2015

In so doing it argued that the certificate wrongly indicated that the judgment in question had become enforceable on 7 March 2000 whereas it had actually become enforceable earlier.

Source officielle