(a)     First set of proceedings On 18 February 2009 the Pyatigorsk Garrison Military Court dismissed the complaint as unfounded.

  Administrative investigations were conducted by a military board of inquiry and by the commanding officer of the garrison to which Maşallah Yılmaz belonged.

ANTONYUK , Alla Georgiyevna, not specified 4 July 2006 2 July 2004, Komsomolskyy District Court of Kherson   345 2. 26132/07 KYRYCHENKO , Tetyana Vitalyivna, 1964 11 June 2007 5 December 2002, Kyiv Garrison

    On an unspecified date the applicant, within the group of other military servicemen, applied to the Vladikavkaz Garrison Military Court against the director of the North Caucasus Military

    The same day V.P. was detained by a decision of the Fifth Garrison Court of the Russian Federation (“the Garrison Court”), which was apparently sitting at the military base. 10 .

period Length of enforcement proceedings Domestic order     29923/08 15/05/2008 Aleksandr Sergeyevich Kudelya   Zaytsev Sergey Yuryevich Fryazino Military Court of the Rostov-on-Don Garrison

    On 14 June 2005 V.T. was questioned by an investigator from the Vladikavkaz garrison military prosecutor’s office (“the garrison military prosecutor’s office”).

    On 16 November 2001 the Sertolovo Garrison Military Court granted in part the applicant's claims concerning free housing due to him under the military service contract.

    On 6 August 2001 the Tula Garrison Military Court granted the applicant’s claim.

; days the Military Commissar of the Rostov Region to recalculate the applicant’s pension 3,500     12724/08 25/01/2008 Suleyman Salmanovich Shabanov 22/12/1965     Vladikavkaz Garrison

    Meanwhile, on 1 April 2005 the 35 th Garrison Military Court (“the Garrison Court”), sitting in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, allowed another claim lodged by the applicant.

On 27 March 2002 the Simferopol Garrison Court allowed the applicant’s claims. By a decision of 18 June 2002 the Navy Court of Appeal quashed that judgment.

On 8 June 2009 the Military Court of the Vladikavkaz Garrison found that the decision of 11 February 2009 had been lawful.

On 13   November 2012 the Vladikavkaz Garrison Military Court closed the proceedings on the grounds that by that date the contested decision had been quashed.

(b)     The applicant’s appeals to courts (i)     Appeal to the military court On 8 October 2015 the applicant appealed before the Grozny Garrison Court against the military investigators

    05/06/2012   Moscow Garrison Military Court     28/11/2011   Moscow Garrison Military Court 23/08/2012   Moscow District Military Court     02/08/2012 &

placement in a metal cage during court hearings and in respect of detention in solitary confinement     5663/18* 20/12/2017 Ilnaz Midkhatovich FASKHUTDINOV 1978       Kazan Garrison

STEF TRANSPORT PLAN D'ORGON [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] Représentée par Me Mikaël PELAN de la SELARL LUSIS AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de PARIS substitué par Me Léa GARISOAIN avocat au barreau de PARIS

On 6 March 2002 the Military Court of the Ryazan Garrison granted the applicant’s claim against military unit no. 41450 for unpaid emoluments and awarded him 137,828 Russian roubles.

On 23 July 2004 the Military Court of the Vladikavkaz Garrison found for the applicant and awarded him 213,025.39 Russian roubles.