The applicant was sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declaration. The Court has not received a response from the applicant accepting the terms of the declaration.

[Mammadov] and Etibar Seyidaga [Agayev].

Mahamadou Diarra, secrétaire général de la préfecture de l’Isère, au bénéfice d’une délégation de signature consentie par arrêté de la préfète de l’Isère du 16 février 2026, régulièrement publié.

    Having regard to the facts of the present case and the clear similarity between these facts and those in the case of Gafgaz Mammadov on all relevant and crucial points, the Court sees no

    The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations. 12.

    Having regard to the facts of the present cases and their clear similarity to those of the Gafgaz Mammadov case on all relevant and crucial points, the Court sees no particular circumstances

the dispersal of the demonstration (see Gafgaz   Mammadov , cited above, § 61).

(See also Lutsenko v. Ukraine , 6492/11, 3   July 2012, Information Note   154 ; Tymoshenko v.

By letter dated 5 October 2018, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of observations   had expired on 8 June 2018 and that no extension of time

The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision.

Having regard to its case-law on the matter (see, for example, Mammadov and Others v.   Azerbaijan , no.

    On 27 April 2011 R.A. sent a letter to the ABA asking for disciplinary proceedings to be instituted against the applicant.

    Has the applicant been subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Labita v.

, for example, Faig Mammadov v.

The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision. The applicants did not accept the terms of the declarations.

The applicants were sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declarations several weeks before the date of this decision. The Court has not received any response from the applicants.

By letters dated 5 May 2021, sent by registered post, the applicants’ representatives were notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicants’ observations had expired on 24 November 2020

In the case of Mammadova v.

The applicant was sent the terms of the Government’s unilateral declaration several weeks before the date of this decision.