Cyprus [GC], § 118; Piersack v. Belgium , § 30; and Grieves v. the United Kingdom [GC], § 69).

  for the applicant Mr Hasip Kaplan , Sir Sydney Kentridge , Mr Mark Muller and Mr Timothy   Otty ,   Counsel , Mr Kerim Yildız , Mr İrfan Dündar , Mr Doğan Erbaş , Ms Gareth   Pierce

This implies that, in deciding whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular judge or a body sitting as a bench lacks impartiality, the standpoint of the person concerned

This implies that, in deciding whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular judge or a body sitting as a bench lacks impartiality, the standpoint of the person concerned

; On 14 June 2011 the Moscow City Court quashed the judgments of 8   December 2010 and 31 March 2011 on appeal and remitted the case to the District Court for a fresh examination by a different bench

This implies that, in deciding whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular judge or a body sitting as a bench lacks impartiality, the standpoint of the person concerned

In consequence, there was no certainty that either of the two other judges on the bench had not consulted the said person in respect of the case.

This implies that, in deciding whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular judge or a body sitting as a bench lacks impartiality, the standpoint of the person concerned

This implies that, in deciding whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular judge or a body sitting as a bench lacks impartiality, the standpoint of the person concerned

On 18 June 1999 Turkey’s Grand National Assembly amended Article   143 of the Constitution and excluded military members (whether of the bench or of the prosecutor’s office) from National Security