On 16 January 2006 the trial court again granted the applicant’s claim awarding him compensation in the same amount as specified above.

They had taken them to a separate room where they had forced them to read military statutes and to do push-ups at the same time. At some point the applicant’s son had collapsed.

Admittedly, the concept of a price being too low was imprecise, but it was to be assessed with reference to transfers of the same type in similar circumstances and the assessment could be challenged by

Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020), that the compensation awarded to the applicant for her land expropriated for public needs was too low. 2.

The reports were drawn up and signed by the same two officers.

The tax surcharges imposed had been based on the same facts as the sentencing in the criminal proceedings.

    On the same date Captains L. and Sh. and Major P. were questioned again.

The court concluded that for that reason the applicant had not been tried twice for the same offence. B.

Consequently, it noted that the penalty imposed was flagrantly too lenient. The Supreme Court did not take note of the applicant’s release on parole.

She described the windows in the sitting room as “circle shaped and other windows were too small”.

He then considered the position of same-sex couples.

On the same day the applicant forwarded identical requests to the Supreme Court of Cassation and the Chief Public Prosecutor. On 17 May 2006 he forwarded an identical request to the Ombudsman.

He argued that his acquittal prevented the further examination of the same matter in taxation proceedings. 14.

use should be made of remedies designed to challenge decisions already given: it normally required also that complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to those same

The applicant claims that it is too dim for reading or writing. There are no chairs or tables and the detainees have to take their meals in bed. The food quality is very poor.

On the same day a criminal investigation was opened into the murder. At about 10 p.m. on that same day the applicants came home where several police officers were waiting for them.

The court ordered the continuation of his detention on remand, for the same reasons as before.

  30979/10 et al, decision of 2 April 2013) which concerned bodies exhumed from the same locations as in these applications and subject to the same investigative procedures.

TOGO, prise en la personne de son représentant légal dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 17] représentée par Maître Samir BELLASRI, avocat au barreau de LYON (avocat postulant) et par Maître Alexandra

A majority voted against both same-sex marriage and same-sex unions, but the turnout was too low for the results of the referendum to be valid.